Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday May 04, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 111: Line 111:  
|}
 
|}
   −
Associated with the triadic relation <math>L\!</math> is a binary relation <math>L_{\underline{~} ~ \underline{~} ~ \operatorname{T}} \subseteq \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B}</math> that is called the ''fiber'' of <math>L\!</math> with <math>\operatorname{T}</math> in the third place.  This object is defined as follows:
+
Associated with the triadic relation <math>L\!</math> is a binary relation <math>L_{\underline{~} \, \underline{~} \, \operatorname{T}} \subseteq \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B}</math> that is called the ''fiber'' of <math>L\!</math> with <math>\operatorname{T}</math> in the third place.  This object is defined as follows:
    
{| align="center" cellspacing="10" width="90%"
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="10" width="90%"
| <math>L_{\underline{~} ~ \underline{~} ~ \operatorname{T}} = \{ (p, q) \in \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} : (p, q, \operatorname{T}) \in L \}.</math>
+
| <math>L_{\underline{~} \, \underline{~} \, \operatorname{T}} = \{ (p, q) \in \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} : (p, q, \operatorname{T}) \in L \}.</math>
 
|}
 
|}
   Line 121: Line 121:  
: <math>\operatorname{Cond} : \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} \to \mathbb{B}\,.\!</math>
 
: <math>\operatorname{Cond} : \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} \to \mathbb{B}\,.\!</math>
   −
Form the binary relation that is called the ''fiber'' of <math>\operatorname{Cond}</math> at <math>T\!</math>, notated as follows:
+
Form the binary relation that is called the ''fiber'' of <math>\operatorname{Cond}</math> at <math>\operatorname{T}</math>, notated as follows:
   −
: <math>\operatorname{Cond}^{-1}(T) \subseteq \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B}\,.\!</math>
+
: <math>\operatorname{Cond}^{-1}(\operatorname{T}) \subseteq \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B}.</math>
    
This object is defined as follows:
 
This object is defined as follows:
   −
: <math>\operatorname{Cond}^{-1}(T) = \{ (p,\ q) \in \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B}\ :\ \operatorname{Cond} (p,\ q) = T \}\,.\!</math>
+
: <math>\operatorname{Cond}^{-1}(\operatorname{T}) = \{ (p, q) \in \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} : \operatorname{Cond} (p, q) = \operatorname{T} \}.</math>
    
The implication sign "<math>\Rightarrow\!</math>" denotes the same formal object as the relation names "<math>L_{..T}\mbox{ }\!</math>" and "<math>\operatorname{Cond}^{-1}(T)\mbox{ }\!</math>", the only differences being purely syntactic.  Thus we have the following logical equivalence:
 
The implication sign "<math>\Rightarrow\!</math>" denotes the same formal object as the relation names "<math>L_{..T}\mbox{ }\!</math>" and "<math>\operatorname{Cond}^{-1}(T)\mbox{ }\!</math>", the only differences being purely syntactic.  Thus we have the following logical equivalence:
12,080

edits

Navigation menu