Line 599: |
Line 599: |
| Dual to the statements of momentary interpretive distinctions (MIDs) are the respective statements of momentary interpretive coincidences (MICs): | | Dual to the statements of momentary interpretive distinctions (MIDs) are the respective statements of momentary interpretive coincidences (MICs): |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | {| align="center" style="text-align:center" width="90%" |
− | j : x = y, x =j y, x = y : j,
| + | | width="33%" | <math>j : x = y\!</math> |
− | j : x <=> y, x <=>j y, x <=> y : j,
| + | | width="33%" | <math>x =_j y\!</math> |
− | j : ((x , y)), ((x , y))j, ((x , y)) : j.
| + | | width="33%" | <math>x = y : j\!</math> |
− | </pre> | + | |- |
| + | | <math>j : x \Leftrightarrow y</math> |
| + | | <math>x \Leftrightarrow_j y</math> |
| + | | <math>x \Leftrightarrow y : j</math> |
| + | |- |
| + | | <math>j : ((x ~,~ y))\!</math> |
| + | | <math>((x ~,~ y))_j\!</math> |
| + | | <math>((x ~,~ y)) : j\!</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| Each of these expressions is intended to indicate a set of circumstances that could otherwise be rendered by any one of the following, logically equivalent statements: | | Each of these expressions is intended to indicate a set of circumstances that could otherwise be rendered by any one of the following, logically equivalent statements: |