Changes

In a related usage, one is permitted to reparse the ''anonymous'' or ''passive'' form of assignment statement:

In a related usage, one is permitted to reparse the ''anonymous'' or ''passive'' form of assignment statement:

<pre>

: <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} x := y {}^{\prime\prime},</math> read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} x ~\text{is set equal to}~ y {}^{\prime\prime},</math>

"x := y", read as "x is set equal to y",

</pre>

converting it into the corresponding ''attributive'' or ''active'' form of assignment statement:

converting it into the corresponding ''attributive'' or ''active'' form of assignment statement:

<pre>

: <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} j : x = y {}^{\prime\prime},</math> read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} j ~\text{sets}~ x ~\text{equal to}~ y {}^{\prime\prime}.</math>

"j : x = y", read as "j sets x equal to y".

</pre>

Returning to the present application, the ''categorical'' project leads one to seek something in the object itself, some factor that divides up its dynamic and symbolic aspects, some plane of cleavage that explains the natural divisions between different types of object system, while the ''methodeutic'' outlook leads one to wonder whether the specialized mode of being that is beheld in the object is not in fact due to something in the style and direction of approach, some artifact of method that is being cast on the object system from the eye of the beholder.

Returning to the present application, the ''categorical'' project leads one to seek something in the object itself, some factor that divides up its dynamic and symbolic aspects, some plane of cleavage that explains the natural divisions between different types of object system, while the ''methodeutic'' outlook leads one to wonder whether the specialized mode of being that is beheld in the object is not in fact due to something in the style and direction of approach, some artifact of method that is being cast on the object system from the eye of the beholder.