MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
61 bytes added
, 14:54, 28 February 2012
Line 3,193: |
Line 3,193: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | '''Point 1.''' Thought takes place in signs. |
− | Point 1. Thought takes place in signs. | |
| | | |
| This makes a sign relation the setting of thought, where thought occurs. In particular, the connotative plane of a sign relation is the medium of thought proper, and the denotative plane of a sign relation embodies the lines of thought's orientation toward its objects. | | This makes a sign relation the setting of thought, where thought occurs. In particular, the connotative plane of a sign relation is the medium of thought proper, and the denotative plane of a sign relation embodies the lines of thought's orientation toward its objects. |
| | | |
− | This point is one that may be thought controversial, until it is realized that the meaning of the term "sign" is being extended to cover anything that might conceivably occur in thought. Far from intending to restrict thought to a circumscribed domain of signs, it expands the definition of "sign" to encompass anything that might enter into thought, so long as this entrance into thought is understood not in the sense of being its object but as something that lends a place to it. Properly taken, this point is tantamount to an empirical definition of the term "sign", more like an indication of where in experience a ready supply of examples can be found. It says that if you seek signs then look to your thoughts. | + | This point is one that may be thought controversial, until it is realized that the meaning of the term “sign” is being extended to cover anything that might conceivably occur in thought. Far from intending to restrict thought to a circumscribed domain of signs, it expands the definition of “sign” to encompass anything that might enter into thought, so long as this entrance into thought is understood not in the sense of being its object but as something that lends a place to it. Properly taken, this point is tantamount to an empirical definition of the term “sign”, more like an indication of where in experience a ready supply of examples can be found. It says that if you seek signs then look to your thoughts. |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Point 2. Thinking is a form of conduct. | | Point 2. Thinking is a form of conduct. |
| | | |