MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday May 02, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
2,983 bytes removed
, 15:12, 26 February 2012
| Line 165: |
Line 165: |
| | | | |
| | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Candidate.27s_closing_statement_about_the_conduct_of_this_RFA Gwen Gale insulted everybody who dared to vote against her]. | | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Candidate.27s_closing_statement_about_the_conduct_of_this_RFA Gwen Gale insulted everybody who dared to vote against her]. |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Gwen Gale is dishonest and untruthful===
| |
| − | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&action=historysubmit&diff=222287525&oldid=222287133 Here's an example of Gwen Gale reverting a clearly good faith edit claiming it was "vandalism"]. In an apparent try to cover up she blocked the editor for edit warring with herself she also claimed "vandalism" in the edit summary for that block.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AJayeba Here's an example of Gwen Gale blocking editor for so called "spamming"]. In an apparent try to cover up she blocked the editor for edit warring with herself she claimed "spamming" . The user was blocked for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maureen_McCormick&diff=prev&oldid=310259332 adding the link to an interview that the subject of the article gave to ''Entertainment Tonight''] which of course had nothing to do with spamming.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Gwen_Gale Gwen Gale mentioned her "Wyss" account in her statement], when she unsuccessfully tried to get elected to ArbCom, but if one was to click on it, he was directed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wyss to Gwen Gale] page. Nowhere in her statement she ever mentioned she was blocked and topic banned while editing as Wyss.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *Gwen Gale failed to disclose "The Witch" account in her RfA. After she was specifically asked about this account, she made a untruthful statement:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Questions_from_BusterD "For about 24 hours, two years ago, yes. I quickly decided User:The Witch was an unhelpful username so I went back to User:Wyss. You will please note the account wasn't used to evade the arbcom ruling. I don't consider this brief experiment relevant but I'll be happy to answer questions about it."] Actually Gwen Gale did evade "the arbcom ruling" . There are hard '''on-wiki''' evidences she evaded her ban on a few occasions. I am not providing them here in order not to be accused in outting, but I will email the evidences to any interested authorized user. Also "The Witch" made her [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depictions_of_lesbian_sex_in_pornography&diff=prev&oldid=31830636 first (not deleted edit)] on December 18, 2005, and her [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5th_Duke_of_Cleveland_hoax&diff=prev&oldid=35817314 last (not deleted edit)] on January 19,2006. So, no, Gwen, your "expirement" lasted mach longer than "about 24 hours". Later on Gwen Gale [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive9#User:The_Witch repeated her untruthful statement once again "I tried that name out for a day, three years ago."]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Gwen_Gale Gwen Gale failed to mention her "The Witch" account in her statement], when she unsuccessfully tried to get elected to ArbCom.
| |
| | | | |
| | ===Recent misuse of administrative tools=== | | ===Recent misuse of administrative tools=== |
