Changes

Gwen Gale did not mention her The Witch account in her first request for administration-ship. After she was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Questions_from_BusterD asked specifically about The Witch account], she lied:

Gwen Gale did not mention her The Witch account in her first request for administration-ship. After she was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Questions_from_BusterD asked specifically about The Witch account], she lied:

{{cquote|"For about 24 hours, two years ago, yes. I quickly decided User:The Witch was an unhelpful username so I went back to User:Wyss. You will please note the account wasn't used to evade the arbcom ruling. I don't consider this brief experiment relevant but I'll be happy to answer questions about it."}} The account was used for a much longer period than 24 hours, and she did "evade the arbcom ruling". In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:5th_Duke_of_Cleveland_hoax&diff=prev&oldid=35547359 this edit] Wyss, editing as The Witch resigns her posts that she made while editing as IP 194.146.111.10. A simple look at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=194.146.111.10 contributions of this IP] proves the violation of her topic ban.

{{cquote|"For about 24 hours, two years ago, yes. I quickly decided User:The Witch was an unhelpful username so I went back to User:Wyss. You will please note the account wasn't used to evade the arbcom ruling. I don't consider this brief experiment relevant but I'll be happy to answer questions about it."}} The account was used for a much longer period than 24 hours, and she did "evade the arbcom ruling". In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:5th_Duke_of_Cleveland_hoax&diff=prev&oldid=35547359 this edit] Wyss, editing as The Witch resigns her posts that she made while editing as IP 194.146.111.10. A simple look at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=194.146.111.10 contributions of this IP] proves the violation of her topic ban that was stated like this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry socks] Wyss used to violate her [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Topic_ban topic ban], the ban that was described like this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone#Ted_Wilkes_and_Wyss_banned_from_making_homosexuality.2Fbisexuality_edits "Wyss is banned from making any edit related to a person's alleged homosexuality or bisexuality. The clauses "any edit" and "related to homosexuality or bisexuality" shall be interpreted broadly; this remedy is intended, for example, to prohibit correcting the spelling of "gay"."] She evaded this ban with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lesbian_science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=82445461 this edit], with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lesbian_science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=82445276 this edit],with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Adams_%28actor%29&diff=prev&oldid=80056340 this edit] and so on. She also added links to herself the article ''Lesbian science fiction'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lesbian_science_fiction&diff=prev&oldid=72310593 here].

===Wyss reaction on being blocked===

===Wyss reaction on being blocked===