MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
693 bytes added
, 22:57, 3 January 2012
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| A "witchy" girl Heidi Wyss became the Wikipedia's witch, when she became [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators wikipedia administrator] Gwen Gale. | | A "witchy" girl Heidi Wyss became the Wikipedia's witch, when she became [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators wikipedia administrator] Gwen Gale. |
| | | |
− | ==Violating of Golden Rule== | + | ==Violating of Golden Rule and dishonesty== |
| | | |
| One of the biggest problems with Wyss is that she always has been treating herself differently than others, violating the Golden Rule: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself." Probably one of the most striking examples of such behavior is a story about Wyss writing two articles on wikipedia about herself:[http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/1431/89587859ig5.jpg Heidi Wyss] and [http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/6083/92979875oe7.jpg Gormglaith (novel)]. One problem with that is that Wyss's notability is way below wikipedia's standards for inclusion (she wrote a single hard to read novel that is available absolutely free of charge on the NET.) Another problem is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest conflict of interest]: for example a person writing about herself could be not neutral. As it is seen from her contributions Wyss was well aware about these policies. She was very active [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&offset=20041205181219&limit=500&target=Wyss in voting on deletion requests of articles written by others],often claiming that a subject of an article is not notable: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Valby&diff=prev&oldid=8288404 "*'''Delete'''. Ad, vanity, and doing off-colour versions of covers isn't notable."] (the article was kept);[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russell_White&diff=prev&oldid=8153396 *'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 18:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)] (the article was kept). | | One of the biggest problems with Wyss is that she always has been treating herself differently than others, violating the Golden Rule: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself." Probably one of the most striking examples of such behavior is a story about Wyss writing two articles on wikipedia about herself:[http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/1431/89587859ig5.jpg Heidi Wyss] and [http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/6083/92979875oe7.jpg Gormglaith (novel)]. One problem with that is that Wyss's notability is way below wikipedia's standards for inclusion (she wrote a single hard to read novel that is available absolutely free of charge on the NET.) Another problem is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest conflict of interest]: for example a person writing about herself could be not neutral. As it is seen from her contributions Wyss was well aware about these policies. She was very active [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&offset=20041205181219&limit=500&target=Wyss in voting on deletion requests of articles written by others],often claiming that a subject of an article is not notable: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Valby&diff=prev&oldid=8288404 "*'''Delete'''. Ad, vanity, and doing off-colour versions of covers isn't notable."] (the article was kept);[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russell_White&diff=prev&oldid=8153396 *'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 18:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)] (the article was kept). |
| | | |
| Then she herself [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29 nominated an article for deletion]. She wrote: | | Then she herself [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29 nominated an article for deletion]. She wrote: |
− | {{cquote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29&oldid=203579523 Conflict of interest, subject of this biographical article is not of encyclopedic interest meyerj is an SPA who created this article to memorialize his father. The subject is not encyclopedic (a routine military career), not widely noted, the article amounts to original research and its creation raises many COI worries.]}} This article was kept. Two articles that Wyss wrote about herself were [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heidi_Wyss&oldid=258277519 deleted]. So here we go: the same person claims that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_J._Meyer Leo J. Meyer], who was one of only three hundred and three men who have been awarded three Combat Infantryman Badges out of more than the twenty-three million, "is not of encyclopedic interest", writes two articles about an absolutely not notable person - herself. The same person who writes two articles about not notable herself sees "many COI worries" with a user writing article about his notable father. | + | {{cquote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29&oldid=203579523 Conflict of interest, subject of this biographical article is not of encyclopedic interest meyerj is an SPA who created this article to memorialize his father. The subject is not encyclopedic (a routine military career), not widely noted, the article amounts to original research and its creation raises many COI worries.]}} This article was kept. Two articles that Wyss wrote about herself were [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heidi_Wyss&oldid=258277519 deleted]. So here we go: the same person claims that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_J._Meyer Leo J. Meyer], who was one of only three hundred and three men who have been awarded three Combat Infantryman Badges out of more than the twenty-three million, "is not of encyclopedic interest", writes two articles about an absolutely not notable person - herself. The same person who writes two articles about not notable herself sees "many COI worries" with a user writing article about his notable father. |
− | | |
− |
| |
| | | |
| + | On October 4, 2008 Gwen Gale accused a user in being [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Adams#November Stephanie Adams] and in violating [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest] |
| + | In particular Gwen wrote {{cquote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gwen_Gale&oldid=243072039#Stop_Making_False_Assumptions_.28Re:_Stephanie_Adams_Article.29 We don't believe you. Please have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. If you carry on disrupting the article, you may be blocked from editing. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)]}} It was written by the very same Gwen Gale who wrote two articles about herself! |
| | | |
| ==Heidi Wyss's wikipedia story== | | ==Heidi Wyss's wikipedia story== |