MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
2,192 bytes added
, 22:50, 11 December 2011
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| Most evidences against Wyss [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence presented at this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Workshop at this page] were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FWilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone%2FWorkshop&action=historysubmit&diff=31671855&oldid=30963842 the evidences] was: | | Most evidences against Wyss [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence presented at this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Workshop at this page] were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FWilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone%2FWorkshop&action=historysubmit&diff=31671855&oldid=30963842 the evidences] was: |
| {{cquote|Wyss is still showing a lack of insight. On 16 December 2005, he/she says on his/her talk page: "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards." See [63]. Onefortyone 23:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)}} but if one is to click on the link with the number 63, one will get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wyss&diff=31560139&oldid=31558060 a page that states: "The relevant page of the wiki was "User:Wyss" and the requested data (for error checking purposes) was: (Diff: 31558060, 31560139)"]. Such deleting of the talk page history violates basic wikipedia policies. | | {{cquote|Wyss is still showing a lack of insight. On 16 December 2005, he/she says on his/her talk page: "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards." See [63]. Onefortyone 23:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)}} but if one is to click on the link with the number 63, one will get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wyss&diff=31560139&oldid=31558060 a page that states: "The relevant page of the wiki was "User:Wyss" and the requested data (for error checking purposes) was: (Diff: 31558060, 31560139)"]. Such deleting of the talk page history violates basic wikipedia policies. |
| + | |
| + | ===Wyss expresses her opinion on wikipedia and wikipedians=== |
| + | [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28news%29&diff=prev&oldid=78918078#Tell_the_Wikitruth In this discussion Wyss said in particular]: |
| + | |
| + | {{cquote|Wikipedia generates the litter, lots of it. Think of Wikipedia as a drunken lout speeding down the "information superhighway" tossing all kinds of sundry codswallop out the car window for others to pick up after. Lots of its dodgy content gets picked up by scraper sites, the Google bots and others, hence multiplying the trash and by the bye, last I heard, littering was a crime in the states (sometimes a serious one). Meanwhile the well-meaning Wikipedia volunteers who try to clean up after Wikipedia's "dark side" generate even more traffic for the site, enhancing its popularity and contributing to Mr Wales' ability to raise millions of dollars for Wikipedia's commercial spin-off Wikia: Their time is utterly wasted in an editorial sense, since Wikipedia's systemic flaws are easily correctible, but nonetheless very helpful in helping Mr Wales with his wider goals (whatever they may be).}} |
| + | Wyss especially did not like members of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_Committee_%28English_Wikipedia%29 Arbitration Committee]: |
| + | {{cquote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fred_Bauder&diff=prev&oldid=30774808 "Truth be told, according to freely available public records, he was suspended for soliciting a client's wife to work in a prostitution ring, then refusing to attend his hearing on it. Many would interpret this as "disbarred" but he denies the term applies. Bauder disclosed none of this to Mr Wales when he was asked to join lawyerish arbcomm.]}} |
| + | {{cquote|1=[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Proposed_decision&diff=prev&oldid=31826736 "Anyway I disagree that I ever disrupted Wikipedia or ever had the personal potential or whim to do that. My contribution history speaks for itself. I've been slapped hard by arbcomm for expressing my opinion that among them lurk wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls who coddle their own kind.]}} |
| | | |
| [[Category:Wikipedia]] | | [[Category:Wikipedia]] |