Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| | | |
| ==1. Introduction== | | ==1. Introduction== |
− | | + | ===1.1. Outline of the Project : Inquiry Into Inquiry=== |
− | ===1.1. Outline of the Project : Inquiry Into Inquiry=== | |
− | | |
| ====1.1.1. Problem==== | | ====1.1.1. Problem==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.1.2. Method==== | | ====1.1.2. Method==== |
− |
| |
| =====1.1.2.1. The Paradigmatic and Process-Analytic Phase===== | | =====1.1.2.1. The Paradigmatic and Process-Analytic Phase===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.1.2.2. The Paraphrastic and Faculty-Synthetic Phase===== | | =====1.1.2.2. The Paraphrastic and Faculty-Synthetic Phase===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.1.2.3. Reprise of Methods===== | | =====1.1.2.3. Reprise of Methods===== |
− |
| |
| ====1.1.3. Criterion==== | | ====1.1.3. Criterion==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.1.4. Application==== | | ====1.1.4. Application==== |
− |
| |
| ===1.2. Onus of the Project : No Way But Inquiry=== | | ===1.2. Onus of the Project : No Way But Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====1.2.1. A Modulating Prelude==== | | ====1.2.1. A Modulating Prelude==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.2.2. A Fugitive Canon==== | | ====1.2.2. A Fugitive Canon==== |
− |
| |
| ===1.3. Option of the Project : A Way Up To Inquiry=== | | ===1.3. Option of the Project : A Way Up To Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.1. Initial Analysis of Inquiry : Allegro Aperto==== | | ====1.3.1. Initial Analysis of Inquiry : Allegro Aperto==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.2. Discussion of Discussion==== | | ====1.3.2. Discussion of Discussion==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.3. Discussion of Formalization : General Topics==== | | ====1.3.3. Discussion of Formalization : General Topics==== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.1. A Formal Charge===== | | =====1.3.3.1. A Formal Charge===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.2. A Formalization of Formalization?===== | | =====1.3.3.2. A Formalization of Formalization?===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.3. A Formalization of Discussion?===== | | =====1.3.3.3. A Formalization of Discussion?===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.4. A Concept of Formalization===== | | =====1.3.3.4. A Concept of Formalization===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach===== | | =====1.3.3.5. A Formal Approach===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.6. A Formal Development===== | | =====1.3.3.6. A Formal Development===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.3.7. A Formal Persuasion===== | | =====1.3.3.7. A Formal Persuasion===== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.4. Discussion of Formalization : Concrete Examples==== | | ====1.3.4. Discussion of Formalization : Concrete Examples==== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.1. Formal Models : A Sketch===== | | =====1.3.4.1. Formal Models : A Sketch===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.2. Sign Relations : A Primer===== | | =====1.3.4.2. Sign Relations : A Primer===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.3. Semiotic Equivalence Relations===== | | =====1.3.4.3. Semiotic Equivalence Relations===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.4. Graphical Representations===== | | =====1.3.4.4. Graphical Representations===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.5. Taking Stock===== | | =====1.3.4.5. Taking Stock===== |
− | | + | =====1.3.4.6. The “Meta” Question===== |
− | =====1.3.4.6. The “Meta” Question===== | |
− | | |
| =====1.3.4.7. Iconic Signs===== | | =====1.3.4.7. Iconic Signs===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.8. The Conflict of Interpretations===== | | =====1.3.4.8. The Conflict of Interpretations===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.9. Indexical Signs===== | | =====1.3.4.9. Indexical Signs===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.10. Sundry Problems===== | | =====1.3.4.10. Sundry Problems===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.11. Review and Prospect===== | | =====1.3.4.11. Review and Prospect===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.12. Objective Plans and Levels===== | | =====1.3.4.12. Objective Plans and Levels===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.13. Formalization of OF : Objective Levels===== | | =====1.3.4.13. Formalization of OF : Objective Levels===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.14. Application of OF : Generic Level===== | | =====1.3.4.14. Application of OF : Generic Level===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.15. Application of OF : Motive Level===== | | =====1.3.4.15. Application of OF : Motive Level===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.16. The Integration of Frameworks===== | | =====1.3.4.16. The Integration of Frameworks===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.17. Recapitulation : A Brush with Symbols===== | | =====1.3.4.17. Recapitulation : A Brush with Symbols===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.18. C'est Moi===== | | =====1.3.4.18. C'est Moi===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.4.19. Entr'acte===== | | =====1.3.4.19. Entr'acte===== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.5. Discussion of Formalization : Specific Objects==== | | ====1.3.5. Discussion of Formalization : Specific Objects==== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.1. The Will to Form===== | | =====1.3.5.1. The Will to Form===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.2. The Forms of Reasoning===== | | =====1.3.5.2. The Forms of Reasoning===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.3. A Fork in the Road===== | | =====1.3.5.3. A Fork in the Road===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.4. A Forged Bond===== | | =====1.3.5.4. A Forged Bond===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.5. A Formal Account===== | | =====1.3.5.5. A Formal Account===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.6. Analogs, Icons, Models, Surrogates===== | | =====1.3.5.6. Analogs, Icons, Models, Surrogates===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.7. Steps and Tests of Formalization===== | | =====1.3.5.7. Steps and Tests of Formalization===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.8. A Puckish Referee===== | | =====1.3.5.8. A Puckish Referee===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.9. Partial Formalizations===== | | =====1.3.5.9. Partial Formalizations===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.10. A Formal Utility===== | | =====1.3.5.10. A Formal Utility===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.11. A Formal Aesthetic===== | | =====1.3.5.11. A Formal Aesthetic===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.12. A Formal Apology===== | | =====1.3.5.12. A Formal Apology===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.13. A Formal Suspicion===== | | =====1.3.5.13. A Formal Suspicion===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.14. The Double Aspect of Concepts===== | | =====1.3.5.14. The Double Aspect of Concepts===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.15. A Formal Permission===== | | =====1.3.5.15. A Formal Permission===== |
− |
| |
| =====1.3.5.16. A Formal Invention===== | | =====1.3.5.16. A Formal Invention===== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.6. Recursion in Perpetuity==== | | ====1.3.6. Recursion in Perpetuity==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.7. Processus, Regressus, Progressus==== | | ====1.3.7. Processus, Regressus, Progressus==== |
− |
| |
| ====1.3.8. Rondeau : Tempo di Menuetto==== | | ====1.3.8. Rondeau : Tempo di Menuetto==== |
| | | |
| ==2. Part 2== | | ==2. Part 2== |
− |
| |
| ===2.1. Reconnaissance=== | | ===2.1. Reconnaissance=== |
− |
| |
| ====2.1.1. The Informal Context==== | | ====2.1.1. The Informal Context==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.1.2. The Epitext==== | | ====2.1.2. The Epitext==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.1.3. The Formative Tension==== | | ====2.1.3. The Formative Tension==== |
− |
| |
| ===2.2. Recurring Themes=== | | ===2.2. Recurring Themes=== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.1. Preliminary Notions==== | | ====2.2.1. Preliminary Notions==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.2. Intermediary Notions==== | | ====2.2.2. Intermediary Notions==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.3. Propositions and Sentences==== | | ====2.2.3. Propositions and Sentences==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.4. Empirical Types and Rational Types==== | | ====2.2.4. Empirical Types and Rational Types==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.5. Articulate Sentences==== | | ====2.2.5. Articulate Sentences==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.6. Stretching Principles==== | | ====2.2.6. Stretching Principles==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.2.7. Stretching Operations==== | | ====2.2.7. Stretching Operations==== |
− |
| |
| ===2.3. The Cactus Patch=== | | ===2.3. The Cactus Patch=== |
− |
| |
| ====2.3.1. The Cactus Language : Syntax==== | | ====2.3.1. The Cactus Language : Syntax==== |
− |
| |
| =====2.3.1.1. Grammar 1===== | | =====2.3.1.1. Grammar 1===== |
− |
| |
| =====2.3.1.2. Grammar 2===== | | =====2.3.1.2. Grammar 2===== |
− |
| |
| =====2.3.1.3. Grammar 3===== | | =====2.3.1.3. Grammar 3===== |
− |
| |
| =====2.3.1.4. Grammar 4===== | | =====2.3.1.4. Grammar 4===== |
− |
| |
| =====2.3.1.5. Grammar 5===== | | =====2.3.1.5. Grammar 5===== |
− |
| |
| =====2.3.1.6. Grammar 6===== | | =====2.3.1.6. Grammar 6===== |
− |
| |
| ====2.3.2. Generalities About Formal Grammars==== | | ====2.3.2. Generalities About Formal Grammars==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.3.3. The Cactus Language : Stylistics==== | | ====2.3.3. The Cactus Language : Stylistics==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.3.4. The Cactus Language : Mechanics==== | | ====2.3.4. The Cactus Language : Mechanics==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.3.5. The Cactus Language : Semantics==== | | ====2.3.5. The Cactus Language : Semantics==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.3.6. Stretching Exercises==== | | ====2.3.6. Stretching Exercises==== |
− |
| |
| ===2.4. Syntactic Transformations=== | | ===2.4. Syntactic Transformations=== |
− |
| |
| ====2.4.1. Syntactic Transformation Rules==== | | ====2.4.1. Syntactic Transformation Rules==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.4.2. Derived Equivalence Relations==== | | ====2.4.2. Derived Equivalence Relations==== |
− |
| |
| ====2.4.3. Digression on Derived Relations==== | | ====2.4.3. Digression on Derived Relations==== |
| | | |
| ==3. Part 3== | | ==3. Part 3== |
− |
| |
| ===3.1. Outlook of the Project : All Ways Lead to Inquiry=== | | ===3.1. Outlook of the Project : All Ways Lead to Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====3.1.1. The Matrix of Inquiry==== | | ====3.1.1. The Matrix of Inquiry==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.1.1. Inquiry as Conduct===== | | =====3.1.1.1. Inquiry as Conduct===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.1.2. Types of Conduct===== | | =====3.1.1.2. Types of Conduct===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.1.3. Perils of Inquiry===== | | =====3.1.1.3. Perils of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.1.4. Forms of Relations===== | | =====3.1.1.4. Forms of Relations===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.1.5. Models of Inquiry===== | | =====3.1.1.5. Models of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.1.2. The Moment of Inquiry==== | | ====3.1.2. The Moment of Inquiry==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.1.3. The Modes of Inquiry==== | | ====3.1.3. The Modes of Inquiry==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.3.1. Deductive Reasoning===== | | =====3.1.3.1. Deductive Reasoning===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.3.2. Inductive Reasoning===== | | =====3.1.3.2. Inductive Reasoning===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.3.3. Abductive Reasoning===== | | =====3.1.3.3. Abductive Reasoning===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.1.3.4. Analogical Reasoning===== | | =====3.1.3.4. Analogical Reasoning===== |
− |
| |
| ===3.2. Obstacles to the Project : In the Way of Inquiry=== | | ===3.2. Obstacles to the Project : In the Way of Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.1. The Initial Unpleasantness==== | | ====3.2.1. The Initial Unpleasantness==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.2. The Justification Trap==== | | ====3.2.2. The Justification Trap==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.3. A Formal Apology==== | | ====3.2.3. A Formal Apology==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.2.3.1. Category Double-Takes===== | | =====3.2.3.1. Category Double-Takes===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.2.3.2. Conceptual Extensions===== | | =====3.2.3.2. Conceptual Extensions===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.2.3.3. Explosional Recombinations===== | | =====3.2.3.3. Explosional Recombinations===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.2.3.4. Interpretive Frameworks===== | | =====3.2.3.4. Interpretive Frameworks===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.4. A Material Exigency==== | | ====3.2.4. A Material Exigency==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.5. A Reconciliation of Accounts==== | | ====3.2.5. A Reconciliation of Accounts==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.6. Objections to Reflective Inquiry==== | | ====3.2.6. Objections to Reflective Inquiry==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.7. Empirical Considerations==== | | ====3.2.7. Empirical Considerations==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.2.8. Computational Considerations==== | | ====3.2.8. Computational Considerations==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.2.8.1. A Form of Recursion===== | | =====3.2.8.1. A Form of Recursion===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.2.8.2. A Power of Abstraction===== | | =====3.2.8.2. A Power of Abstraction===== |
− |
| |
| ===3.3. Orientation of the Project : A Way Into Inquiry=== | | ===3.3. Orientation of the Project : A Way Into Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.1. Initial Description of Inquiry==== | | ====3.3.1. Initial Description of Inquiry==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.2. Terms of Analysis==== | | ====3.3.2. Terms of Analysis==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.2.1. Digression on Signs===== | | =====3.3.2.1. Digression on Signs===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.2.2. Empirical Status of ID===== | | =====3.3.2.2. Empirical Status of ID===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.3. Expansion of Terms==== | | ====3.3.3. Expansion of Terms==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.3.1. Agency===== | | =====3.3.3.1. Agency===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.3.2. Abstraction===== | | =====3.3.3.2. Abstraction===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.3.3. Analogy===== | | =====3.3.3.3. Analogy===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.3.4. Accuracy===== | | =====3.3.3.4. Accuracy===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.3.5. Authenticity===== | | =====3.3.3.5. Authenticity===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.4. Anchoring Terms in Phenomena==== | | ====3.3.4. Anchoring Terms in Phenomena==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.4.1. A Mistaken ID===== | | =====3.3.4.1. A Mistaken ID===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.4.2. Phenomenology of Doubt===== | | =====3.3.4.2. Phenomenology of Doubt===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.4.3. Modalities of Knowledge===== | | =====3.3.4.3. Modalities of Knowledge===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.5. Sets, Systems, and Substantive Agents==== | | ====3.3.5. Sets, Systems, and Substantive Agents==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.6. Interpretive Systems==== | | ====3.3.6. Interpretive Systems==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.6.1. Syntactic Systems===== | | =====3.3.6.1. Syntactic Systems===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.6.2. Semantic Systems===== | | =====3.3.6.2. Semantic Systems===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.6.3. Pragmatic Systems===== | | =====3.3.6.3. Pragmatic Systems===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.3.7. Inquiry Driven Systems==== | | ====3.3.7. Inquiry Driven Systems==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.7.1. A Definition of Inquiry===== | | =====3.3.7.1. A Definition of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.7.2. The Faculty of Inquiry===== | | =====3.3.7.2. The Faculty of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.7.3. A Definition of Determination===== | | =====3.3.7.3. A Definition of Determination===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.3.7.4. A Definition of Definition===== | | =====3.3.7.4. A Definition of Definition===== |
− |
| |
| ===3.4. Organization of the Project : A Way Through Inquiry=== | | ===3.4. Organization of the Project : A Way Through Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====3.4.1. The Problem : Inquiry Found as an Object of Study==== | | ====3.4.1. The Problem : Inquiry Found as an Object of Study==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.4.2. The Method : Inquiry Found as a Means of Study==== | | ====3.4.2. The Method : Inquiry Found as a Means of Study==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.4.2.1. Conditions for the Possibility of Inquiry into Inquiry===== | | =====3.4.2.1. Conditions for the Possibility of Inquiry into Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.4.2.2. Conditions for the Success of Inquiry into Inquiry===== | | =====3.4.2.2. Conditions for the Success of Inquiry into Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.4.3. The Criterion : Inquiry in Search of a Sensible End==== | | ====3.4.3. The Criterion : Inquiry in Search of a Sensible End==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.4.3.1. The Irritation of Doubt, and The Scratch Test===== | | =====3.4.3.1. The Irritation of Doubt, and The Scratch Test===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.4.3.2. Enabling Provision 1 : The Scenes and Context of Inquiry===== | | =====3.4.3.2. Enabling Provision 1 : The Scenes and Context of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.4.3.3. Enabling Provision 2 : The Stages and Content of Inquiry===== | | =====3.4.3.3. Enabling Provision 2 : The Stages and Content of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| ===3.5. Objectives of the Project : Inquiry All the Way=== | | ===3.5. Objectives of the Project : Inquiry All the Way=== |
− |
| |
| ====3.5.1. Substantial Objective==== | | ====3.5.1. Substantial Objective==== |
− |
| |
| =====3.5.1.1. Objective 1a : The Propositions as Types Analogy===== | | =====3.5.1.1. Objective 1a : The Propositions as Types Analogy===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.5.1.2. Objective 1b : The Styles of Proof Development===== | | =====3.5.1.2. Objective 1b : The Styles of Proof Development===== |
− |
| |
| =====3.5.1.3. Objective 1c : The Analysis of Interpreters, or A Problem with Authority===== | | =====3.5.1.3. Objective 1c : The Analysis of Interpreters, or A Problem with Authority===== |
− |
| |
| ====3.5.2. Instrumental Objective==== | | ====3.5.2. Instrumental Objective==== |
− |
| |
| ====3.5.3. Coordination of Objectives==== | | ====3.5.3. Coordination of Objectives==== |
| + | ====3.5.4. Recapitulation — Da Capo, Al Segno==== |
| | | |
− | ====3.5.4. Recapitulation : Da Capo, Al Segno==== | + | ==4. Discussion of Inquiry== |
− | | |
− | ==Part 4. Discussion of Inquiry==
| |
− | | |
| ===4.1. Approaches to Inquiry=== | | ===4.1. Approaches to Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====4.1.1. The Classical Framework : Syllogistic Approaches==== | | ====4.1.1. The Classical Framework : Syllogistic Approaches==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.1.2. The Pragmatic Framework : Sign-Theoretic Approaches==== | | ====4.1.2. The Pragmatic Framework : Sign-Theoretic Approaches==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.1.3. The Dynamical Framework : System-Theoretic Approaches==== | | ====4.1.3. The Dynamical Framework : System-Theoretic Approaches==== |
− |
| |
| =====4.1.3.1. Inquiry and Computation===== | | =====4.1.3.1. Inquiry and Computation===== |
− |
| |
| =====4.1.3.2. Inquiry Driven Systems===== | | =====4.1.3.2. Inquiry Driven Systems===== |
− |
| |
| ===4.2. The Context of Inquiry=== | | ===4.2. The Context of Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====4.2.1. The Field of Observation==== | | ====4.2.1. The Field of Observation==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.2.2. The Problem of Reflection==== | | ====4.2.2. The Problem of Reflection==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.2.3. The Problem of Reconstruction==== | | ====4.2.3. The Problem of Reconstruction==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.2.4. The Trivializing of Integration==== | | ====4.2.4. The Trivializing of Integration==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.2.5. Tensions in the Field of Observation==== | | ====4.2.5. Tensions in the Field of Observation==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.2.6. Problems of Representation and Communication==== | | ====4.2.6. Problems of Representation and Communication==== |
− |
| |
| ===4.3. The Conduct of Inquiry=== | | ===4.3. The Conduct of Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====4.3.1. Introduction==== | | ====4.3.1. Introduction==== |
− |
| |
| ====4.3.2. The Types of Reasoning==== | | ====4.3.2. The Types of Reasoning==== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.2.1. Deduction===== | | =====4.3.2.1. Deduction===== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.2.2. Induction===== | | =====4.3.2.2. Induction===== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.2.3. Abduction===== | | =====4.3.2.3. Abduction===== |
− |
| |
| ====4.3.3. Hybrid Types of Inference==== | | ====4.3.3. Hybrid Types of Inference==== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.3.1. Analogy===== | | =====4.3.3.1. Analogy===== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.3.2. Inquiry===== | | =====4.3.3.2. Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| ====4.3.4. Details of Induction==== | | ====4.3.4. Details of Induction==== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.4.1. Learning===== | | =====4.3.4.1. Learning===== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.4.2. Transfer===== | | =====4.3.4.2. Transfer===== |
− |
| |
| =====4.3.4.3. Testing===== | | =====4.3.4.3. Testing===== |
− |
| |
| ====4.3.5. The Stages of Inquiry==== | | ====4.3.5. The Stages of Inquiry==== |
| | | |
| ==5. Interlude : The Medium and Its Message== | | ==5. Interlude : The Medium and Its Message== |
− |
| |
| ===5.1. Reflective Expression=== | | ===5.1. Reflective Expression=== |
− | | + | ====5.1.1. Casual Reflection==== |
| + | =====5.1.1.1. Ostensibly Recursive Texts===== |
| + | =====5.1.1.2. Analogical Recursion===== |
| + | ====5.1.2. Conscious Reflection==== |
| + | =====5.1.2.1. The Signal Moment===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.2. The Symbolic Object===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.3. The Endeavor to Communicate===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.4. The Medium of Communication===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.5. The Ark of Types : The Order of Things to Come===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.6. The Epitext===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.7. The Context of Interpretation===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.8. The Formative Tension===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.9. The Vehicle of Communication : Reflection on the Scene, Reflection on the Self===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.10. (7)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.11. (6)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.12. Recursions : Possible, Actual, Necessary===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.13. Ostensibly Recursive Texts===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.14. (3)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.15. The Freedom of Interpretation===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.16. The Eternal Return===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.17. (1)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.18. Information in Formation===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.19. Reflectively Indexical Texts===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.20. (4)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.21. (5)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.22. (6)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.23. (7)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.24. (8)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.25. The Discursive Universe===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.26. (7)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.27. (6)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.28. (5)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.29. (4)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.30. (3)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.31. (2)===== |
| + | =====5.1.2.32. (1)===== |
| ===5.2. Reflective Inquiry=== | | ===5.2. Reflective Inquiry=== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry==== | | ====5.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations==== | | ====5.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.3. A Reflective Heuristic==== | | ====5.2.3. A Reflective Heuristic==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.4. Either/Or : A Sense of Absence==== | | ====5.2.4. Either/Or : A Sense of Absence==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.5. Apparent, Occasional, and Practical Necessity==== | | ====5.2.5. Apparent, Occasional, and Practical Necessity==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.6. Approaches, Aspects, Exposures, Fronts==== | | ====5.2.6. Approaches, Aspects, Exposures, Fronts==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.7. Synthetic A Priori Truths==== | | ====5.2.7. Synthetic A Priori Truths==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.8. Priorisms of Normative Sciences==== | | ====5.2.8. Priorisms of Normative Sciences==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.9. Principle of Rational Action==== | | ====5.2.9. Principle of Rational Action==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.10. The Pragmatic Cosmos==== | | ====5.2.10. The Pragmatic Cosmos==== |
− |
| |
| ====5.2.11. Reflective Interpretive Frameworks==== | | ====5.2.11. Reflective Interpretive Frameworks==== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.1. Principals vs. Principals===== | | =====5.2.11.1. Principals vs. Principals===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.2. The Initial Description of Inquiry===== | | =====5.2.11.2. The Initial Description of Inquiry===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.3. An Early Description of Interpretation===== | | =====5.2.11.3. An Early Description of Interpretation===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.4. Descriptions of the Mind===== | | =====5.2.11.4. Descriptions of the Mind===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.5. Of Signs and the Mind===== | | =====5.2.11.5. Of Signs and the Mind===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.6. Questions of Justification===== | | =====5.2.11.6. Questions of Justification===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.7. The Experience of Satisfaction===== | | =====5.2.11.7. The Experience of Satisfaction===== |
− |
| |
| =====5.2.11.8. An Organizational Difficulty===== | | =====5.2.11.8. An Organizational Difficulty===== |
| + | =====5.2.11.9. Pragmatic Certainties===== |
| + | =====5.2.11.10. Problems and Methods===== |
| + | ===5.3. Reflection on Reflection=== |
| + | ====Looking Back==== |
| + | ====The Light in the Clearing==== |
| + | ====The Face in the Mirror==== |
| + | ====Points Forward==== |
| | | |
− | =====5.2.11.9. Pragmatic Certainties===== | + | ==6. Reflective Interpretive Frameworks== |
| + | ===6.1. The Phenomenology of Reflection=== |
| + | ===6.2. A Candid Point of View=== |
| + | ===6.3. A Projective Point of View=== |
| + | ===6.4. A Formal Point of View=== |
| + | ===6.5. Three Styles of Linguistic Usage=== |
| + | ===6.6. Basic Notions of Group Theory=== |
| + | ===6.7. Basic Notions of Formal Language Theory=== |
| + | ===6.8. A Perspective on Computation=== |
| + | ===6.9. Higher Order Sign Relations : Introduction=== |
| + | ===6.10. Higher Order Sign Relations : Examples=== |
| + | ===6.11. Higher Order Sign Relations : Application=== |
| + | ===6.12. Issue 1. The Status of Signs=== |
| + | ===6.13. Issue 2. The Status of Sets=== |
| + | ===6.14. Issue 3. The Status of Variables=== |
| + | ===6.15. Propositional Calculus=== |
| + | ===6.16. Recursive Aspects=== |
| + | ===6.17. Patterns of Self-Reference=== |
| + | ===6.18. Practical Intuitions=== |
| + | ===6.19. Examples of Self Reference=== |
| + | ===6.20. Three Views of Systems=== |
| + | ===6.21. Building Bridges Between Representations=== |
| + | ===6.22. Extensional Representations of Sign Relations=== |
| + | ===6.23. Intensional Representations of Sign Relations=== |
| + | ===6.24. Literal Intensional Representations=== |
| + | ===6.25. Analytic Intensional Representations=== |
| + | ===6.26. Differential Logic and Directed Graphs=== |
| + | ===6.27. Differential Logic and Group Operations=== |
| + | ===6.28. The Bridge : From Obstruction to Opportunity=== |
| + | ===6.29. Projects of Representation=== |
| + | ===6.30. Connected, Integrated, Reflective Symbols=== |
| + | ===6.31. Relations in General=== |
| + | ===6.32. Partiality : Selective Operations=== |
| + | ===6.33. Sign Relational Complexes=== |
| + | ===6.34. Set-Theoretic Constructions=== |
| + | ===6.35. Reducibility of Sign Relations=== |
| + | ===6.36. Irreducibly Triadic Relations=== |
| + | ===6.37. Propositional Types=== |
| + | ===6.38. Considering the Source=== |
| + | ===6.39. Prospective Indices : Pointers to Future Work=== |
| + | ===6.40. Dynamic and Evaluative Frameworks=== |
| + | ===6.41. Elective and Motive Forces=== |
| + | ===6.42. Sign Processes : A Start=== |
| + | ===6.43. Reflective Extensions=== |
| + | ===6.44. Reflections on Closure=== |
| + | ===6.45. Intelligence => Critical Reflection=== |
| + | ===6.46. Looking Ahead=== |
| + | ===6.47. Mutually Intelligible Codes=== |
| + | ===6.48. Discourse Analysis : Ways and Means=== |
| + | ===6.49. Combinations of Sign Relations=== |
| + | ===6.50. Revisiting the Source=== |
| | | |
− | =====5.2.11.10. Problems and Methods===== | + | ==7. Part 7== |
| + | ===7.1. Divertimento : Eternity in Love with the Creatures of Time=== |
| + | ====7.1.1. Reflections on the Presentation of Examples==== |
| + | ====7.1.2. Searching for Parameters==== |
| + | ====7.1.3. Defect Analysis==== |
| + | ====7.1.4. The Pragmatic Critique==== |
| + | ====7.1.5. Pragmatic Operating Notions==== |
| + | ====7.1.6. Defects of Presentation==== |
| + | ====7.1.7. Dues to Process==== |
| + | ====7.1.8. Duties to Purpose==== |
| + | ===7.2. Computational Design Philosophy=== |
| + | ====7.2.1. Intentional Objects and Attitudes==== |
| + | ====7.2.2. Imperfect Design and Persistent Error==== |
| + | ====7.2.3. Propositional Reasoning About Relations==== |
| + | ====7.2.4. Dynamic and Evaluative Frameworks==== |
| + | ====7.2.5. Discussion of Examples==== |
| + | ====7.2.6. Information and Inquiry==== |
| | | |
− | ===5.3. Reflection on Reflection=== | + | ==8. Overview of the Domain : Interpretive Inquiry== |
| + | ===8.1. Interpretive Bearings : Conceptual and Descriptive Frameworks=== |
| + | ====8.1.1. Catwalks : Flexible Frameworks and Peripatetic Categories==== |
| + | =====8.1.1.1. Eponymous Ancestors : The Precursors of Abstraction?===== |
| + | =====8.1.1.2. Reticles : Interpretive Flexibility as a Design Issue===== |
| + | ====8.1.2. Heuristic Inclinations and Regulative Principles==== |
| + | ===8.2. Features of Inquiry Driven Systems=== |
| + | ====8.2.1. The Pragmatic Theory of Signs==== |
| + | =====8.2.1.1. Sign Relations===== |
| + | =====8.2.1.2. Types of Signs===== |
| + | ====8.2.2. The Pragmatic Theory of Inquiry==== |
| + | =====8.2.2.1. Abduction===== |
| + | =====8.2.2.2. Deduction===== |
| + | =====8.2.2.3. Induction===== |
| + | ===8.3. Examples of Inquiry Driven Systems=== |
| + | ====8.3.1. “Index” : A Program for Learning Formal Languages==== |
| + | ====8.3.2. “Study” : A Program for Reasoning with Propositions==== |
| + | ===8.4. Discussion and Development of Objectives=== |
| + | ====8.4.1. Objective 1a : Propositions as Types==== |
| + | ====8.4.2. Objective 1b : Proof Styles and Developments==== |
| + | ====8.4.3. Objective 1c : Interpretation and Authority==== |
| | | |
| ==Appendices== | | ==Appendices== |
| + | ===Logical Translation Rule 1=== |
| + | ===Geometric Translation Rule 1=== |
| + | ===Logical Translation Rule 2=== |
| + | ===Geometric Translation Rule 2=== |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |