MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
1,512 bytes added
, 16:14, 20 August 2011
Line 55: |
Line 55: |
| | | |
| =====8.1.1.2. Reticles : Interpretive Flexibility as a Design Issue===== | | =====8.1.1.2. Reticles : Interpretive Flexibility as a Design Issue===== |
| + | |
| + | As separate objects and independent constructs in and of themselves, interpretive frameworks are like the templates that observers impose on the scenes viewed through a reticle. Outside the slim chance of a pre-established harmony among them, there is no guarantee that the forms of intuition permitted by these instruments are essentially designed to fit the objects surveyed. Any notion of the world is a compromise between the specious and the factitious and yet supplies the mind with its only available grasp on reality. |
| + | |
| + | The artifactual nature of the mind's handle on things is a commonplace observation of most philosophies, but there is a job here that remains to be carried out. Descriptively, the task that falls to this project is to consider how computational models of interpretive systems can be designed to take this factor into explicit account. Instrumentally, it is a design goal of this project to reflect this aspect of interpretive frameworks in the implementation of their supporting software, and thus to recognize and incorporate a feature in the artifact that seems unavoidable in the natural case. |
| + | |
| + | Later, in making use of formal calculi, I will propose that the distinction between constants and variables can be treated as interpretive and need not be a fixture of the syntactic specification. This means it will be part of the meaning that is left up to the interpreter which symbols have fixed interpretations and which are taken as surrogates for a variety of substitutions. |
| | | |
| ====8.1.2. Heuristic Inclinations and Regulative Principles==== | | ====8.1.2. Heuristic Inclinations and Regulative Principles==== |