MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday November 13, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
19 bytes added
, 18:07, 12 April 2007
Line 43: |
Line 43: |
| # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070113-us-somalia.htm Suddenly, the war widens] By Lynda Hurst <u>Toronto Star</u> January 13, 2007 -- "I don't think we've seen the end of it in Somalia," says John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org. | | # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070113-us-somalia.htm Suddenly, the war widens] By Lynda Hurst <u>Toronto Star</u> January 13, 2007 -- "I don't think we've seen the end of it in Somalia," says John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org. |
| # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070113-new-warhead.htm New Warhead Could Siphon Funds From Sub Builders] By Seth Owen <u>The Day, CT</u> January 13, 2007 -- Production of the newer W88 warhead that was originally going to replace the W76 was stopped for safety and technical reasons after about 400 were made, according to estimates by GlobalSecurity.org, leaving about 3,000 W76 warheads to arm the rest of the missiles. | | # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070113-new-warhead.htm New Warhead Could Siphon Funds From Sub Builders] By Seth Owen <u>The Day, CT</u> January 13, 2007 -- Production of the newer W88 warhead that was originally going to replace the W76 was stopped for safety and technical reasons after about 400 were made, according to estimates by GlobalSecurity.org, leaving about 3,000 W76 warheads to arm the rest of the missiles. |
− | # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070112-iran-actions.htm Video: Recent US actions could signal Iran conflict, despite White House denials; GOPer's bill requires Congress OK on Iran] By David Edwards and Mike Sheehan <u>The Raw Story</u> January 12, 2007 -- Several analysts consider parts of President Bush's latest speech as an obvious threat to Iran. One, John Pike of GlobalSecurity.org, notes that U.S. actions could signal a conflict in the near future. | + | # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070112-iran-actions.htm Video: Recent US actions could signal Iran conflict, despite White House denials; GOPer's bill requires Congress OK on Iran] By David Edwards and Mike Sheehan <u>The Raw Story</u> January 12, 2007 -- Several analysts consider parts of President Bush's latest speech as an obvious threat to [[Directory:Iran|Iran]]. One, John Pike of GlobalSecurity.org, notes that U.S. actions could signal a conflict in the near future. |
| # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070112-duties-danger.htm For US troops, new duties, more danger] By Brad Knickerbocker <u>The Christian Science Monitor</u> January 12, 2007 -- "The US can sustain this escalation indefinitely, provided that there is an increase in end strength, longer and more frequent deployments, greater reliance on the guard and reserve, more money for recruitment and retention, and further lowering of standards for recruits," says John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org. "All of this will cost time and money." | | # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070112-duties-danger.htm For US troops, new duties, more danger] By Brad Knickerbocker <u>The Christian Science Monitor</u> January 12, 2007 -- "The US can sustain this escalation indefinitely, provided that there is an increase in end strength, longer and more frequent deployments, greater reliance on the guard and reserve, more money for recruitment and retention, and further lowering of standards for recruits," says John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org. "All of this will cost time and money." |
| # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070112-deployments.htm How the Army decides who deploys] By Nancy Montgomery <u>Stars and Stripes</u> January 12, 2007 -- “Deployment of Army forces is on a schedule that deploys units for 12 months, with 12 months at home,” according to GlobalSecurity.org. | | # [http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2007/070112-deployments.htm How the Army decides who deploys] By Nancy Montgomery <u>Stars and Stripes</u> January 12, 2007 -- “Deployment of Army forces is on a schedule that deploys units for 12 months, with 12 months at home,” according to GlobalSecurity.org. |