MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
6 bytes removed
, 21:57, 22 October 2010
mLine 1: |
Line 1: |
− | I just [href="http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28080&view=findpost&p=214080 learned today] that if you consider all of the English Wikipedia's biographies of living people, and cross-reference that list with a server-level database of the pages that registered editor accounts have decided to put on their own "Watchlist" (to keep tabs on changes to the articles), something grave becomes apparent. | + | I just [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28080&view=findpost&p=214080 learned today] that if you consider all of the English Wikipedia's biographies of living people, and cross-reference that list with a server-level database of the pages that registered editor accounts have decided to put on their own "Watchlist" (to keep tabs on changes to the articles), something grave becomes apparent. |
| | | |
| Over 295,000 such biographies, or nearly 70% of all biographies of living people, are being watched by fewer than 4 registered accounts. Not to mention, there's no telling if those watchlists are in the possession of accounts who log in daily or weekly or monthly or not since [http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=271 Essjay said he was a multi-degreed theologian]. | | Over 295,000 such biographies, or nearly 70% of all biographies of living people, are being watched by fewer than 4 registered accounts. Not to mention, there's no telling if those watchlists are in the possession of accounts who log in daily or weekly or monthly or not since [http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=271 Essjay said he was a multi-degreed theologian]. |