Line 399: |
Line 399: |
| I am including Peirce's preamble to his restatement of the principle because I think that the note of irony and the foreshadowing of comedy intimated by it are important to understanding the gist of what follows. In this rendition the statement of the principle of pragmatism is recast in a partially self-referent fashion, and since it is itself delivered as a "theoretical judgment expressible in a sentence in the indicative mood" the full content of its own deeper meaning is something that remains to be unwrapped, precisely through a self-application to its own expression of the very principle it expresses. To wit, this statement, the form of whose phrasing is forced by conventional biases to take on the style of a declarative judgment, describes itself as a "confused form of thought", in need of being amended, converted, and translated into its operational interpretant, that is to say, its viable pragmatic equivalent. | | I am including Peirce's preamble to his restatement of the principle because I think that the note of irony and the foreshadowing of comedy intimated by it are important to understanding the gist of what follows. In this rendition the statement of the principle of pragmatism is recast in a partially self-referent fashion, and since it is itself delivered as a "theoretical judgment expressible in a sentence in the indicative mood" the full content of its own deeper meaning is something that remains to be unwrapped, precisely through a self-application to its own expression of the very principle it expresses. To wit, this statement, the form of whose phrasing is forced by conventional biases to take on the style of a declarative judgment, describes itself as a "confused form of thought", in need of being amended, converted, and translated into its operational interpretant, that is to say, its viable pragmatic equivalent. |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | The fifth excerpt, PM<sub>5</sub>, is useful by way of additional clarification, and was aimed to correct a variety of historical misunderstandings that arose over time with regard to the intended meaning of the pragmatic POV. |
− | The fifth excerpt, PM_5, is useful by way of additional clarification, | |
− | and was aimed to correct a variety of historical misunderstandings that | |
− | arose over time with regard to the intended meaning of the pragmatic POV. | |
| | | |
− | | The doctrine appears to assume that the end of man is action —- | + | {| align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%" |
− | | a stoical axiom which, to the present writer at the age of
| |
− | | sixty, does not recommend itself so forcibly as it did at
| |
− | | thirty. If it be admitted, on the contrary, that action
| |
− | | wants an end, and that that end must be something of a
| |
− | | general description, then the spirit of the maxim itself,
| |
− | | which is that we must look to the upshot of our concepts
| |
− | | in order rightly to apprehend them, would direct us towards
| |
− | | something different from practical facts, namely, to general
| |
− | | ideas, as the true interpreters of our thought.
| |
| | | | | |
− | |(Peirce, CP 5.3, 1902). | + | <p>The doctrine appears to assume that the end of man is action — a stoical axiom which, to the present writer at the age of sixty, does not recommend itself so forcibly as it did at thirty. If it be admitted, on the contrary, that action wants an end, and that that end must be something of a general description, then the spirit of the maxim itself, which is that we must look to the upshot of our concepts in order rightly to apprehend them, would direct us towards something different from practical facts, namely, to general ideas, as the true interpreters of our thought.</p> |
| + | |- |
| + | | align="right" | (Peirce, CP 5.3, 1902). |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | If anyone thinks that an explanation on this order, whatever | + | If anyone thinks that an explanation on this order, whatever degree of directness and explicitness one perceives it to have, ought to be enough to correct any amount of residual confusion, then one is failing to take into consideration the persistence of a ''particulate'' interpretation, that is, a favored, isolated, and partial interpretation, once it has taken or mistaken its moment. |
− | degree of directness and explicitness one perceives it to have, | |
− | ought to be enough to correct any amount of residual confusion, | |
− | then one is failing to take into consideration the persistence | |
− | of a "particulate" interpretation, that is, a favored, isolated, | |
− | and partial interpretation, once it has taken or mistaken its | |
− | moment. | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| A sixth excerpt, PM_6, is useful in stating the bearing of | | A sixth excerpt, PM_6, is useful in stating the bearing of |
| the pragmatic maxim on the topic of reflection, namely, that | | the pragmatic maxim on the topic of reflection, namely, that |