MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
1,234 bytes removed
, 02:36, 19 September 2010
Line 550: |
Line 550: |
| a loose way, ignoring elements of the source domain and | | a loose way, ignoring elements of the source domain and |
| collapsing material distinctions in irregular fashions. | | collapsing material distinctions in irregular fashions. |
− | </pre>
| |
− |
| |
− | =====1.3.5.10. A Formal Utility=====
| |
− |
| |
− | <pre>
| |
− | | Ultimate solution. -- We believe in reason:
| |
− | | this, however, is the philosophy of gray concepts.
| |
− | | Language depends on the most naive prejudices.
| |
− | |
| |
− | | (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 522, 283).
| |
− |
| |
− | The usefulness of the MOI as the upshot of the formalization arrow is
| |
− | that it provides discussion with a compact image of the source domain.
| |
− | In formalization one strives to extract a simpler image of the larger
| |
− | inquiry, a context of participatory action that one is too embroiled
| |
− | in carrying out step by step to see as a whole. Seen in this light,
| |
− | the purpose of formalization is to identify a simpler version of the
| |
− | problematic phenomenon or to fashion a simpler image of the difficult
| |
− | inquiry, one that is well-defined enough and simple enough to assure
| |
− | its termination in a finite interval of space and time. As a result,
| |
− | one of the main benefits of adopting the objective of formalization
| |
− | is that it equips discussion with a pre-set termination criterion,
| |
− | or a "stopping rule".
| |
− |
| |
− | In the context of the recursive inquiry that I have outlined,
| |
− | the step of formalization is intended to bring discussion
| |
− | appreciably closer to a solid base for the operational
| |
− | definition of inquiry.
| |
| </pre> | | </pre> |