MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday January 04, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
47 bytes removed
, 01:14, 3 September 2010
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| ====1.3.12. Syntactic Transformations==== | | ====1.3.12. Syntactic Transformations==== |
| | | |
− | We have been examining several distinct but closely related notions of ''indication''. To discuss the import of these ideas in greater depth, it serves to establish a number of logical relations and set-theoretic identities that can be found to hold among their roughly parallel arrays of conceptions and constructions. Facilitating this task requires in turn a number of auxiliary concepts and notations. The notions of indication in question are expressed in a variety of different notations, enumerated as follows: | + | We have been examining several distinct but closely related notions of ''indication''. To discuss the import of these ideas in greater depth, it serves to establish a number of logical relations and set-theoretic identities that can be found to hold among this array of conceptions and constructions. Facilitating this task requires in turn a number of auxiliary concepts and notations. The notions of indication in question are expressed in a variety of different notations, enumerated as follows: |
| | | |
| # The functional language of propositions | | # The functional language of propositions |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| # The geometric language of sets | | # The geometric language of sets |
| | | |
− | Thus, one way to explain the relationships that exist among several concepts of indication is to describe the translations that must hold as a result between the associated families of notation. | + | Thus, one way to explain the relationships that exist among these concepts is to describe the ''translations'' that are induced among the allied families of notation. |
| | | |
| ===Syntactic Transformation Rules=== | | ===Syntactic Transformation Rules=== |