Changes

<p>Who hath learnt any wit or understanding in Logique?  Where are her faire promises?  Nec ad melius vivendum, nec ad commodius disserendum:  Neither to live better nor to dispute fitter.</p>

<p>Who hath learnt any wit or understanding in Logique?  Where are her faire promises?  Nec ad melius vivendum, nec ad commodius disserendum:  Neither to live better nor to dispute fitter.</p>

<p>Montaigne, ''Essays'', Book 3, Chapter 8.  [http://www.uoregon.edu/~rbear/montaigne/3viii.htm Eprint].</p>

<p>Montaigne, ''Essays'', Book 3, Chapter 8.  [http://www.uoregon.edu/~rbear/montaigne/3viii.htm Online].</p>

|}

|}

<p>The precursors of hatred arise from the infant's response to what William James (1890) called the "booming buzzing confusion" that assaults the infant's sensorium at perception's birth.  The "stranger anxiety" evident as early as eight months indicates that the mental capacity to perceive differences in objects and to organize subjective psychic forces has already begun.  Freud (1915) tells us that "hate, as a relation to objects, is older than love" (p. 139).  Freud continues, "As an expression of the reaction of unpleasure evoked by objects, it always remains in an intimate relation with the self-preservative instincts;  so that sexual and ego-instincts can readily develop an antithesis which repeats that of love and hate".</p>

<p>The precursors of hatred arise from the infant's response to what William James (1890) called the "booming buzzing confusion" that assaults the infant's sensorium at perception's birth.  The "stranger anxiety" evident as early as eight months indicates that the mental capacity to perceive differences in objects and to organize subjective psychic forces has already begun.  Freud (1915) tells us that "hate, as a relation to objects, is older than love" (p. 139).  Freud continues, "As an expression of the reaction of unpleasure evoked by objects, it always remains in an intimate relation with the self-preservative instincts;  so that sexual and ego-instincts can readily develop an antithesis which repeats that of love and hate".</p>

<p>Eloise Moore Agger (issue ed.), "Prologue", Special Issue on "Hatred And Its Rewards", ''Psychoanalytic Inquiry'' 20(3), 2000.  [http://www.psychoanalyticinquiry.com/ Eprint].</p>

<p>Eloise Moore Agger (issue ed.), "Prologue", Special Issue on "Hatred And Its Rewards", ''Psychoanalytic Inquiry'' 20(3), 2000.  [http://www.psychoanalyticinquiry.com/ Online].</p>

|}

|}

* Peirce, C.S. (1867), "On a New List of Categories", ''Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences'' 7 (1868), 287–298.  Presented, 14 May 1867.  Reprinted (CP 1.545–559), (CE 2, 49–59), (EP 1, 1–10).

* Peirce, C.S. (1867), "On a New List of Categories", ''Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences'' 7 (1868), 287–298.  Presented, 14 May 1867.  Reprinted (CP 1.545–559), (CE 2, 49–59), (EP 1, 1–10).

* Peirce, C.S. (1877), "The Fixation of Belief", ''Popular Science Monthly'' 12, 1–15, 1877.  Reprinted, CP 5.358–387.  [http://www.peirce.org/writings/p107.html Eprint].

* Peirce, C.S. (1877), "The Fixation of Belief", ''Popular Science Monthly'' 12, 1–15, 1877.  Reprinted, CP 5.358–387.  [http://www.peirce.org/writings/p107.html Online].

* Peirce, C.S. (1878), "How to Make Our Ideas Clear", ''Popular Science Monthly'' 12, 286–302, 1878.  Reprinted, CP 5.388–410.  [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/How_to_Make_Our_Ideas_Clear Eprint].

* Peirce, C.S. (1878), "How to Make Our Ideas Clear", ''Popular Science Monthly'' 12, 286–302, 1878.  Reprinted, CP 5.388–410.  [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/How_to_Make_Our_Ideas_Clear Online].

* Peirce, C.S. (1899), "F.R.L." [First Rule of Logic], unpaginated manuscript, c. 1899.  Reprinted, CP 1.135–140.  [http://www.princeton.edu/~batke/peirce/frl_99.htm Eprint].

* Peirce, C.S. (1899), "F.R.L." [First Rule of Logic], unpaginated manuscript, c. 1899.  Reprinted, CP 1.135–140.  [http://www.princeton.edu/~batke/peirce/frl_99.htm Online].

* Peirce, C.S. (1902), "Application of C.S. Peirce to the Executive Committee of the Carnegie Institution" (1902 [[July 15]]).  Published, "Parts of Carnegie Application" (L75), pp. 13–73 in ''The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce, Volume&nbsp;4, Mathematical Philosophy'', Carolyn Eisele (ed.), Mouton Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands, 1976. [http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/bycsp/l75/l75.htm Eprint, Joseph Ransdell (ed.)].

* Peirce, C.S. (1902), "Application of C.S. Peirce to the Executive Committee of the Carnegie Institution" (1902 [[July 15]]).  Published, "Parts of Carnegie Application" (L75), pp. 13–73 in ''The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce, Volume&nbsp;4, Mathematical Philosophy'', Carolyn Eisele (ed.), Mouton Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands, 1976. [http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/bycsp/l75/l75.htm Online, Joseph Ransdell (ed.)].

==Further reading==

==Further reading==

* Awbrey, Jon, and Awbrey, Susan (1995), "Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry", ''Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines'' 15, 40–52.  [http://www.chss.montclair.edu/inquiry/fall95/awbrey.html Eprint].

* Awbrey, Jon, and Awbrey, Susan (1995), "Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry", ''Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines'' 15, 40–52.  [http://www.chss.montclair.edu/inquiry/fall95/awbrey.html Online].

* [[André De Tienne|De Tienne, André]] (2006), "Peirce's Logic of Information", Seminario del Grupo de Estudios Peirceanos, Universidad de Navarra, 28 Sep 2006.  [http://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html Eprint].

* [[André De Tienne|De Tienne, André]] (2006), "Peirce's Logic of Information", Seminario del Grupo de Estudios Peirceanos, Universidad de Navarra, 28 Sep 2006.  [http://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html Online].

==See also==

==See also==