MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday February 17, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
10 bytes added
, 16:13, 30 April 2010
Line 71: |
Line 71: |
| ** Guillelmus de Hennore. ''Sophisma'' 'Sola species definitur'. (23vB & 44rA-46rB) | | ** Guillelmus de Hennore. ''Sophisma'' 'Sola species definitur'. (23vB & 44rA-46rB) |
| * Caius 611/341 | | * Caius 611/341 |
− | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. | + | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. (1r-24v) |
| * Caius 612/543 | | * Caius 612/543 |
| ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. | | ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. |