Changes

== Wikipedia Articles Concerning Former Yugoslavia==

== Wikipedia Articles Concerning Former Yugoslavia==

The articles that appear in Wikipedia (as of 2009) do not reflect this modern view of the former Yugoslavia.  They still adhere to and reflect the propaganda of the former '''Communist Party of Yugoslavia''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Yugoslavia].  

The articles that appear in Wikipedia (as of 2009) do not reflect this modern view of the former Yugoslavia.  They still adhere to and reflect the propaganda of the former [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Yugoslavia Communist Party of Yugoslavia].  

The article about the Dictator Josip Broz Tito is written in a child-like manner, similar to a Yugoslav primary school textbook from the 1970s. From the late 1960’s to the 1970’s, economic decisions that were made by Josip Broz and the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, put the country in a disastrous political situation (none of this is mentioned). Ironically the article on Tito does not even mention the fact that he was a Dictator or his Cult of Personality [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUZx70JDseU&feature=related] [http://books.google.it/books?id=TjOsyebOTS8C&pg=PA152&dq=yugoslavia+tito+cult&lr=&as_brr=3#v=onepage&q=yugoslavia%20tito%20cult&f=false]. None of this information is presented in a professional encyclopedic fashion and when qualified references are presented to prove otherwise, Wikipedia Admin meets it with silence. Why is this the case?

The article about the Dictator Josip Broz Tito is written in a child-like manner, similar to a Yugoslav primary school textbook from the 1970s. From the late 1960’s to the 1970’s, economic decisions that were made by Josip Broz and the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, put the country in a disastrous political situation (none of this is mentioned). Ironically the article on Tito does not even mention the fact that he was a Dictator or his [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality Cult of Personality] <ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUZx70JDseU&feature=related BBC 4]Tito's Ghosts</ref><ref> [http://books.google.it/books?id=TjOsyebOTS8C&pg=PA152&dq=yugoslavia+tito+cult&lr=&as_brr=3#v=onepage&q=yugoslavia%20tito%20cult&f=false] Death of the Father: An Anthropology of the end in Political Authority by Di John Borneman.</ref> None of this information is presented in a professional encyclopedic fashion. Why is this the case?

Since the early 90’s information concerning historical events surrounding Croatia are turning out to be similar to the history of the Soviet Union (massacres, ethnic cleansing, power struggles, political propaganda for cover ups of the truth). They are a sharp contrast to what the public of the West was feed (media wise) and taught during the Cold War. There is very little mention of Tito's notorious [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGB KGB] police style organisations [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDBA UDBA] & [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OZNA OZNA].[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2v4118TV8c]  

Since the early 90’s information concerning historical events surrounding Croatia are turning out to be similar to the history of the Soviet Union (massacres, ethnic cleansing, power struggles, political propaganda for cover ups of the truth). They are a sharp contrast to what the public of the West was feed (media wise) and taught during the Cold War. There is very little mention of Tito's notorious [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGB KGB] police style organisations [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDBA UDBA] & [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OZNA OZNA].[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2v4118TV8c]