Line 692: |
Line 692: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (26) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (30) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 703: |
Line 703: |
| Since the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))}</math> involves just three variables, it may be worth the trouble to draw a venn diagram of the situation. There are in fact two different ways to execute the picture. | | Since the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))}</math> involves just three variables, it may be worth the trouble to draw a venn diagram of the situation. There are in fact two different ways to execute the picture. |
| | | |
− | Figure 27 indicates the points of the universe of discourse <math>X\!</math> for which the proposition <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B}</math> has the value 1, here interpreted as the logical value <math>\operatorname{true}.</math> In this ''paint by numbers'' style of picture, one simply paints over the cells of a generic template for the universe <math>X,\!</math> going according to some previously adopted convention, for instance: Let the cells that get the value 0 under <math>f\!</math> remain untinted and let the cells that get the value 1 under <math>f\!</math> be painted or shaded. In doing this, it may be good to remind ourselves that the value of the picture as a whole is not in the ''paints'', in other words, the <math>0, 1\!</math> in <math>\mathbb{B},</math> but in the pattern of regions that they indicate. | + | Figure 31 indicates the points of the universe of discourse <math>X\!</math> for which the proposition <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B}</math> has the value 1, here interpreted as the logical value <math>\operatorname{true}.</math> In this ''paint by numbers'' style of picture, one simply paints over the cells of a generic template for the universe <math>X,\!</math> going according to some previously adopted convention, for instance: Let the cells that get the value 0 under <math>f\!</math> remain untinted and let the cells that get the value 1 under <math>f\!</math> be painted or shaded. In doing this, it may be good to remind ourselves that the value of the picture as a whole is not in the ''paints'', in other words, the <math>0, 1\!</math> in <math>\mathbb{B},</math> but in the pattern of regions that they indicate. |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" |
− | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (27) | + | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (31) |
| |- | | |- |
| | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q \texttt{))~(} p \texttt{~(} r \texttt{))}</math> | | | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q \texttt{))~(} p \texttt{~(} r \texttt{))}</math> |
Line 715: |
Line 715: |
| The easiest way to see the sense of the venn diagram is to notice that the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow q,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ q {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Its assertion effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>Q.\!</math> In a similar manner, the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow r,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ r {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Asserting it effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>R.\!</math> | | The easiest way to see the sense of the venn diagram is to notice that the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow q,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ q {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Its assertion effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>Q.\!</math> In a similar manner, the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow r,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ r {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Asserting it effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>R.\!</math> |
| | | |
− | Figure 28 shows the other standard way of drawing a venn diagram for such a proposition. In this ''punctured soap film'' style of picture — others may elect to give it the more dignified title of a ''logical quotient topology'' — one begins with Figure 27 and then proceeds to collapse the fiber of 0 under <math>X\!</math> down to the point of vanishing utterly from the realm of active contemplation, arriving at the following picture: | + | Figure 32 shows the other standard way of drawing a venn diagram for such a proposition. In this ''punctured soap film'' style of picture — others may elect to give it the more dignified title of a ''logical quotient topology'' — one begins with Figure 31 and then proceeds to collapse the fiber of 0 under <math>X\!</math> down to the point of vanishing utterly from the realm of active contemplation, arriving at the following picture: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" |
− | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (28) | + | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (32) |
| |- | | |- |
| | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q ~ r \texttt{))}</math> | | | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q ~ r \texttt{))}</math> |
Line 752: |
Line 752: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (29) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (33) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 769: |
Line 769: |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
| | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)) Proof 1.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)) Proof 1.jpg|500px]] |
− | | (30) | + | | (34) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 822: |
Line 822: |
| | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] |
| |} | | |} |
− | | (31) | + | | (35) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 829: |
Line 829: |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
| | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) DNF.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) DNF.jpg|500px]] |
− | | (32) | + | | (36) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 848: |
Line 848: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| + | | (37) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 894: |
Line 895: |
| | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] |
| |} | | |} |
− | | (33) | + | | (38) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 900: |
Line 901: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P Q R , (P)).jpg|500px]] || (34) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P Q R , (P)).jpg|500px]] || (39) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 906: |
Line 907: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph ((P , P Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (35) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph ((P , P Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (40) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 926: |
Line 927: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (36) | + | | (41) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 945: |
Line 946: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (37) | + | | (42) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 976: |
Line 977: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (38) | + | | (43) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 1,011: |
Line 1,012: |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
| | [[Image:Logical Graph (( (P (Q)) (P (R)) , (P (Q R)) )).jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Logical Graph (( (P (Q)) (P (R)) , (P (Q R)) )).jpg|500px]] |
− | | (39) | + | | (44) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 1,090: |
Line 1,091: |
| | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- QED.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- QED.jpg|500px]] |
| |} | | |} |
− | | (40) | + | | (45) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |