2,646
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday April 19, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchHelp:Water Cooler (technical) (view source)
Revision as of 22:18, 14 February 2007
, 22:18, 14 February 2007→The 50 Pound Sack of Potatoes
Specific attributes that apply to a single area of Centiare are fine, but I think we also have to have some more general attributes like "Celebrity Name" so that if CelebrityXYZ has an article about directing a movie in one article and in another article they are acting in a movie, a fan (Centiare user) can just query Celebrity Name and get all articles.--[[User:OmniMediaGroup|OmniMediaGroup]] 10:56, 14 February 2007 (PST)
Specific attributes that apply to a single area of Centiare are fine, but I think we also have to have some more general attributes like "Celebrity Name" so that if CelebrityXYZ has an article about directing a movie in one article and in another article they are acting in a movie, a fan (Centiare user) can just query Celebrity Name and get all articles.--[[User:OmniMediaGroup|OmniMediaGroup]] 10:56, 14 February 2007 (PST)
===Can You Handle the Truth?===
OMG, as usual, you're completely correct. More correct than you might think, so I guess it's time to spring a little secret: [[Special:Relations|Relations]] can work both ways ie the [[has type:inverse]] of each other. For example, [[Relation:Capital Of]] is the inverse of [[Relation:Has Capital]], and vice versa.
So far, we haven't really pursued two-way relations because they can be somewhat redundant. Besides, [[Centiare:ASK]] queries can be run at the '''''target''''' pages to produce, in effect, a mirror entry. One-way relations work great when we have a pyramid structure, like [[Relation:Page Of]] for your books @ [[Directory:KJ Kitchens|KJ Kitchens]] or political subdivisions like [[Relation:State Located In]] at [[Directory:Caliornia|Caliornia]].
For movies however, we have equal weight between people & movies, so we do need two-way relations like ''Actor In'' at an actor's page and ''Has Actor'' at the movie page. If we don't use inverse relations, then one would need to run an ASK query at either location to get all other relations to that page, BUT they would be dependent on all the information being there. Make sense?
So, IMHO, here's what needs to happen: I went through IMDB and listed all the respective info sections they have for both people & movies. Before I go and create a bunch of semantic tags, I need both of you to understand the technical issues (described above) & get on board with their utilization. I've listed them here in the same order as they appear at IMDB for us to discuss. [[User:Snerfling|Snerfling]] 14:18, 14 February 2007 (PST)
==Medical Tags==
==Medical Tags==
OK, here's our medical [[Centiare:ACR]] workspace. Let's use just a regular bulleted list until we reach some type of consensus. At that point, I'll create the actual tags, provide definitions/usage policy, and run some demo ASK queries. Once we have a basic standard, then anyone else ever creating medical info can follow the same methods. [[User:Snerfling|Snerfling]] 17:31, 13 February 2007 (PST)
OK, here's our medical [[Centiare:ACR]] workspace. Let's use just a regular bulleted list until we reach some type of consensus. At that point, I'll create the actual tags, provide definitions/usage policy, and run some demo ASK queries. Once we have a basic standard, then anyone else ever creating medical info can follow the same methods. [[User:Snerfling|Snerfling]] 17:31, 13 February 2007 (PST)
