Page history
17 December 2014
→Notes
+203
including some links - they are all archived, but you can see the proof there
+407
no edit summary
+124
add link
+216
Undo revision 464888 by MyWikiBiz (talk) with all due respect, it is important to write the factually accurate version with the information about the hacking
+4,308
Reverting to more stable version, until Blissyu2 can address concerns I have raised on his User Talk page.
-4,308
no edit summary
-248
no need to say who slimvirgin really is
-16
redundant
m-33
no edit summary
m+52
finishing its history - it doesn't really exist anymore
+455
Undo revision 464880 by Blissyu2 (talk) yes it was in 2008, as shown by the link
+74
actually i am not sure when the later hacking took place.
-8
extra bracket
m-1
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review
+92
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review: calling it succinct is a bit too positive. This was done by one of the people who hacked the site
-15
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review: there was only ever one trusted users forum. we did talk about having multiple ones but there was never really much point to having more than 1
-7
→Background
+135
→Background: fix link
m+1
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review: typo
m-1
Just fixing up oh so many things here. I hope that I haven't trodden on any toes here.
+3,828
14 October 2010
30 September 2009
29 September 2009
18 April 2009
no edit summary
+245
correct, expand (the wikipediareview.com domain was not registered by Igor Alexander. He founded the Proboards forum)
+187
13 October 2008
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review
+1
no edit summary
+25
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review: tidy
+7
→The Aims of Wikipedia Review: Somey's statement of the aims of W-R, posted on the occasion of a major outage.
+1,537
real smooth
-3
→Background
+29
no edit summary
+650
New page: The '''Wikipedia Review''' is an Internet forum for the discussion of Wikimedia projects, particularly the English Wikipedia. As of July 2008 the forum contains over 100,000 posts....
+191
