12,080
edits
Changes
Directory talk:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Peirce's 1870 Logic Of Relatives (view source)
Revision as of 18:18, 10 October 2007
, 18:18, 10 October 2007segment
</pre>
</pre>
==Work Area 1==
==Discussion Work Areas==
==Discussion Work Area 1==
<pre>
<pre>
BM: Several discussions could take place there,
BM: Several discussions could take place there,
BM: I will be very grateful if you can make something with all that stuff.
BM: I will be very grateful if you can make something with all that stuff.
</pre>
==Discussion Work Area 2==
<pre>
BM: I also found this passage which may be of some interest
BM: I also found this passage which may be of some interest
(CP 4.540, Prolegomena to an Apology of Pragmatism):
(CP 4.540, Prolegomena to an Apology of Pragmatism):
way of dividing signs" is the logical theory of numbers. I give this from
way of dividing signs" is the logical theory of numbers. I give this from
memory. I have not the quote at hand now but I will search for it if needed.
memory. I have not the quote at hand now but I will search for it if needed.
</pre>
==Discussion Work Area 3==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
(c) As to the Nature of the Assurance of the Utterance
(c) As to the Nature of the Assurance of the Utterance
</pre>
==Discussion Work Area 4==
<pre>
JA: It may appear that one has side-stepped the issue of empiricism
JA: It may appear that one has side-stepped the issue of empiricism
that way, but then all that stuff about the synthetic a priori
that way, but then all that stuff about the synthetic a priori
like to bring up the notion of the synthetic apriori?
like to bring up the notion of the synthetic apriori?
But why?
But why?
</pre>
==Discussion Work Area 5==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
But in any case, I thought I saw some better appreciation of the
But in any case, I thought I saw some better appreciation of the
questions in your comments above.
questions in your comments above.
</pre>
==Discussion Work Area 6==
<pre>
It's been that way for about as long as anybody can remember, and
It's been that way for about as long as anybody can remember, and
it will remain so, in spite of the spate of history rewriting and
it will remain so, in spite of the spate of history rewriting and
image re-engineering that has become the new rage in self-styled
image re-engineering that has become the new rage in self-styled
"analytic" circles.
"analytic" circles.
</pre>
==Discussion Work Area 7==
<pre>
The brands of objection that you continue to make, with no evidence
The brands of objection that you continue to make, with no evidence
of reflection on the many explanations that I and others have taken
of reflection on the many explanations that I and others have taken