Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia/Boy Scouts are for spanking"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Shortly after, Peter Damian opened one of the most watched threads on Wikipedia Review [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15438].
 
Shortly after, Peter Damian opened one of the most watched threads on Wikipedia Review [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15438].
  
 +
==Contents of the Spanking Art Wiki==
 
No trace of the 'spanking art wiki' remains on a WMF server, as the site was closed down within days following the campaign on Wikipedia Review.  However it moved to a different host ("Our mission is to create the world's most comprehensive and detailed database on spanking art.") and many (not all) of the images remain on the new site.  It still features the work of artist 'Comixpank' whose speciality is depicting the corporal punishment of cubs (8-11 year old scouts).  His work has been hosted on several sites (including Wikia) but all closed down.  Some links below - none of these feature his more graphic work (which is almost certainly illegal.
 
No trace of the 'spanking art wiki' remains on a WMF server, as the site was closed down within days following the campaign on Wikipedia Review.  However it moved to a different host ("Our mission is to create the world's most comprehensive and detailed database on spanking art.") and many (not all) of the images remain on the new site.  It still features the work of artist 'Comixpank' whose speciality is depicting the corporal punishment of cubs (8-11 year old scouts).  His work has been hosted on several sites (including Wikia) but all closed down.  Some links below - none of these feature his more graphic work (which is almost certainly illegal.
  

Revision as of 08:01, 12 May 2010

The original 'Boy Scouts are for spanking?' thread began on 22nd January when 'John Russ Finley', later banned, complained on Jimmy Wales talk page as follows.

I'm delighted to see that Wikipedia has a GFDL image of some boys involved in the Boy Scouts mission. I'm not so delighted to see that photo copied into a Wikia called "Spanking Art", to enhance an article about Boy Scouts that reads:
"While nowadays the Scouting movement prohibits the use of corporal punishment as part of its activities, this was not always so, and in spanking stories they often go hand in hand, especially with Beaver and Cub Scouts. There are also some spanking drawings that show young scouts, e.g. by Comixpank."
"Because of the connotations of discipline that comes with scouting, some adult spankophiles like to roleplay/ageplay a boy or girl scout (similar to playing schoolboys)."
Exactly what kind of perverts are Wikia and the Wikimedia Foundation enabling, by allowing them free and unfettered access to simple pictures of boys, that are then twisted and exploited on your for-profit company's website, so that they are interwoven into adult perversions and roleplay? [1]

Shortly after, Peter Damian opened one of the most watched threads on Wikipedia Review [2].

Contents of the Spanking Art Wiki

No trace of the 'spanking art wiki' remains on a WMF server, as the site was closed down within days following the campaign on Wikipedia Review. However it moved to a different host ("Our mission is to create the world's most comprehensive and detailed database on spanking art.") and many (not all) of the images remain on the new site. It still features the work of artist 'Comixpank' whose speciality is depicting the corporal punishment of cubs (8-11 year old scouts). His work has been hosted on several sites (including Wikia) but all closed down. Some links below - none of these feature his more graphic work (which is almost certainly illegal.

  • The famous image of cubs being spanked [3]
  • Gallery of his 'artwork' [4]
  • This one [5] is a graphic description of a headmaster caning a boy ("with his left hand, he grabbed the crotch of Ben's undies and pulled them up. This had the desired effect of showing all of Ben's firm round bottom ...").
  • There is also some nice 'artwork' of little girls being spanked. [6] and material such as naked little girls being lined up for a medical examination [7]

The most disturbing material (since entirely removed) was the photographs of little girls taken from Flickr and put out of all context. Some of them were unclothed - entirely innocent but disturbing in this new setting. The parents of the children were contacted by Wikipedia Review, and the material eventually removed, though not without a great deal of protest from the wiki adminstrators.