Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Pornopedia/2010-May porn purge"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Restored material== | ==Restored material== | ||
| − | + | *[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/Martin_Van_Maele_-_La_Grande_Danse_macabre_des_vifs_-_29.jpg Incest pedophile drawing] | |
| + | *[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Female_bottomlessness_in_photography Female bottomless] | ||
| + | *[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Upskirt 'Up skirt'] | ||
==Material that was always there== | ==Material that was always there== | ||
* [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:List_of_genitalia_for_review List of genitalia] | * [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:List_of_genitalia_for_review List of genitalia] | ||
| + | *[http://webcitation.org/query.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3ALolimanga.JPG Wikipedia editor's child porn collection] (now deleted). | ||
==Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki== | ==Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
*[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-November/thread.html#56236 Hand wringing over whether they should be welcome] | *[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-November/thread.html#56236 Hand wringing over whether they should be welcome] | ||
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive132#Self_identified_underage_user Should 6 year olds be allowed to edit?] | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive132#Self_identified_underage_user Should 6 year olds be allowed to edit?] | ||
| + | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG Public librarian] user DGG [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058234.html says] "There is no general agreement here that any system of filtering for any purpose is ever necessary, and I think it is totally contrary to the entire general idea behind the the free culture movement. | ||
| + | |||
== Wales attacked by the community== | == Wales attacked by the community== | ||
==Reaction of Wikimedia foundation== | ==Reaction of Wikimedia foundation== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Bad_image_list Bad images] | ||
| + | http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058091.html Wales admits deletions to foundation | ||
| + | ** [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058092.html I'm sorry I acted with such urgency] | ||
| + | |||
| + | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=360967824#Re-upload_Commons_artwork_that.27s_been_deleted_by_Jimbo_Wales Village pump discussion | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 11 May 2010
News coverage
- Wikipedia purges porn Fox news 7 May
- Wikimedia dumps porn following FoxNews probe Silicon Republic 10 May
- Wikimedia pornography row deepens as Wales cedes rights BBC 10 May
- Wikipedia-porn-row-sees-founder-give-up-his-editing-privileges Daily Telegraph 11 May
- Wikipedia roiled by porn row The Inquirer 11 May
Wales' purge
Restored material
Material that was always there
- List of genitalia
- Wikipedia editor's child porn collection (now deleted).
Debates on the Commons and Meta-wiki
Wikipedia culture
Evidence that the political culture of Wikipedia is deeply hostile to getting rid of porn.
- Rosenzweig, fatuous comment on Wales' talk page
- David Gerard "These vicious morons"
- Wales' talk page at commons
- Wales' talk page at en:Wkipedia
- Pro-pedo POV pushers
- pro-bestiality POV pushers
- Sexualised images of children and the Wikipedia mascot
- Paid shills for the porn industry
- Pedophiles can be productive editors
- "The censorship of centuries-old art is a very frightening event" a Wikipedia editor speaks to the press.
- Pedophiles are welcome
- Hand wringing over whether they should be welcome
- Should 6 year olds be allowed to edit?
- Public librarian user DGG says "There is no general agreement here that any system of filtering for any purpose is ever necessary, and I think it is totally contrary to the entire general idea behind the the free culture movement.
Wales attacked by the community
Reaction of Wikimedia foundation
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-May/058091.html Wales admits deletions to foundation
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=360967824#Re-upload_Commons_artwork_that.27s_been_deleted_by_Jimbo_Wales Village pump discussion
