Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday May 02, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 52: Line 52:       −
Skopp page
+
=== From Skopp's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoophilia&oldid=92371032 talk page] (Dec 2006) ===
 
  −
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoophilia&oldid=92371032 (Dec 2006)
      
Is this article a covert attempt to proselytize against the practice of human-animal sex? No. Knowledge and information empowers people. I think you are reading too much into it. the information here is sobering, granted, but it is not conjured up from nowhere. And there are many editors who argue that the main page on Zoophilia is doing exactly the opposite, so there you go.  Skopp  23:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoophilia_and_health&oldid=192786456
 
Is this article a covert attempt to proselytize against the practice of human-animal sex? No. Knowledge and information empowers people. I think you are reading too much into it. the information here is sobering, granted, but it is not conjured up from nowhere. And there are many editors who argue that the main page on Zoophilia is doing exactly the opposite, so there you go.  Skopp  23:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zoophilia_and_health&oldid=192786456
Line 73: Line 71:       −
--------------------
+
=== A very very bad editor ===
 +
 
 
I'm still significantly less than happy about the approach and style exhibited on these articles, in some ways and areas. I see that this is likely to become a source of abrasion, and I would like to avoid that before it does so more than it already is.
 
I'm still significantly less than happy about the approach and style exhibited on these articles, in some ways and areas. I see that this is likely to become a source of abrasion, and I would like to avoid that before it does so more than it already is.
  
3,209

edits

Navigation menu