Changes

The next few subsections will be concerned with the most problematic features of the <math>\text{A}</math> and <math>\text{B}</math> dialogue, especially with the sorts of difficulties that are clues to significant deficits in theory and technique, and that point out directions for future improvements.

The next few subsections will be concerned with the most problematic features of the <math>\text{A}</math> and <math>\text{B}</math> dialogue, especially with the sorts of difficulties that are clues to significant deficits in theory and technique, and that point out directions for future improvements.

=====1.3.4.6. The "Meta" Question=====

=====1.3.4.6. The &ldquo;Meta&rdquo; Question=====

There is one point of common contention that I finessed from play in my handling of the discussion between <math>\text{A}</math> and <math>\text{B}</math>, even though it lies in plain view on both their Tables.  This is the troubling business, recalcitrant to analysis precisely because its operations race on so heedlessly ahead of thought and grind on so routinely beneath its notice, that concerns the placement of object languages within the frame of a meta-language.

There is one point of common contention that I finessed from play in my handling of the discussion between <math>\text{A}</math> and <math>\text{B}</math>, even though it lies in plain view on both their Tables.  This is the troubling business, recalcitrant to analysis precisely because its operations race on so heedlessly ahead of thought and grind on so routinely beneath its notice, that concerns the placement of object languages within the frame of a meta-language.