12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Futures Of Logical Graphs (view source)
Revision as of 21:10, 30 July 2009
, 21:10, 30 July 2009→Categories of structured individuals: TeX markup
As things work out, the syntactic factors are formally the same, leaving our dualing interpretations to differ in their semantic components alone. Specifically, we have the following mappings:
As things work out, the syntactic factors are formally the same, leaving our dualing interpretations to differ in their semantic components alone. Specifically, we have the following mappings:
{| align="center" cellpadding="10" width="90%"
| <math>\operatorname{En}_\text{sem} :</math> [[Image:Cactus Node Big Fat.jpg|16px]] <math>\mapsto \operatorname{false},</math> [[Image:Cactus Spike Big Fat.jpg|12px]] <math>\mapsto \operatorname{true}.</math>
|-
| <math>\operatorname{Ex}_\text{sem} :</math> [[Image:Cactus Node Big Fat.jpg|16px]] <math>\mapsto \operatorname{true},</math> [[Image:Cactus Spike Big Fat.jpg|12px]] <math>\mapsto \operatorname{false}.</math>
|}
On the other side of the ledger, because the syntactic factors, ''En''<sub>syn</sub> and ''Ex''<sub>syn</sub>, are indiscernible from each other, there is a syntactic contribution to the overall interpretation process that can be most readily investigated on purely formal grounds. That will be the task to face when next we meet on these lists.
On the other side of the ledger, because the syntactic factors, ''En''<sub>syn</sub> and ''Ex''<sub>syn</sub>, are indiscernible from each other, there is a syntactic contribution to the overall interpretation process that can be most readily investigated on purely formal grounds. That will be the task to face when next we meet on these lists.
