15
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday May 02, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchCriticism of crowdsourcing (view source)
Revision as of 08:28, 9 October 2008
, 08:28, 9 October 2008→Name ideas: adding some thoughts and name ideas
:Wrongs of the Internet
:Wrongs of the Internet
:Rethinking Free Culture
:Rethinking Free Culture
:Wikipedia Analysis (attn: Wikipedia is copyrighted. Can we use this name? ) or WikiAnalysis
:WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school...although this might not work for an international audience)
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.
==Reserved domain names==
==Reserved domain names==
