MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
425 bytes removed
, 01:26, 16 February 2010
Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |
− | <center>
| + | {{GKAdBrite}} |
− | <adsense>
| |
− | google_ad_client = 'pub-4781341637005814';
| |
− | google_ad_width = 468;
| |
− | google_ad_height = 60;
| |
− | google_ad_format = '468x60_as';
| |
− | google_ad_type = 'text_image';//2006-12-28: MWB Directory space
| |
− | google_ad_channel = '2388332058';
| |
− | google_color_border = '6699CC';
| |
− | google_color_bg = '003366';
| |
− | google_color_link = 'FFFFFF';
| |
− | google_color_text = 'AECCEB';
| |
− | google_color_url = 'AECCEB';
| |
− | </adsense>
| |
− | </center>
| |
| <br> | | <br> |
| Well after [[Wikipedia_scandals#Essjay_is_not_a_professor|the scandal]] evolved into a serious public relations threat to Wikipedia's credibility, Wales sought to deflect responsibility for the whole affair by blaming the Arbitration Committee that he himself had created: "EssJay was appointed at the request of and unanimous support of the ArbCom." - Jimmy Wales [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083549.html 17 October 2007]. Perplexed members of the Arbitration Committee responded by saying it would be more accurate to describe their "unanimous support" as "nobody objected to Jimbo's nomination of Essjay". | | Well after [[Wikipedia_scandals#Essjay_is_not_a_professor|the scandal]] evolved into a serious public relations threat to Wikipedia's credibility, Wales sought to deflect responsibility for the whole affair by blaming the Arbitration Committee that he himself had created: "EssJay was appointed at the request of and unanimous support of the ArbCom." - Jimmy Wales [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083549.html 17 October 2007]. Perplexed members of the Arbitration Committee responded by saying it would be more accurate to describe their "unanimous support" as "nobody objected to Jimbo's nomination of Essjay". |