Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 03, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
425 bytes removed ,  01:26, 16 February 2010
Update Google AdSense script with AdBrite template
Line 23: Line 23:     
<br>
 
<br>
<center>
+
{{GKAdBrite}}
<adsense>
  −
google_ad_client    = 'pub-4781341637005814';
  −
google_ad_width    = 468;
  −
google_ad_height    = 60;
  −
google_ad_format    = '468x60_as';
  −
google_ad_type      = 'text_image';//2006-12-28: MWB Directory space
  −
google_ad_channel  = '2388332058';
  −
google_color_border = '6699CC';
  −
google_color_bg    = '003366';
  −
google_color_link  = 'FFFFFF';
  −
google_color_text  = 'AECCEB';
  −
google_color_url    = 'AECCEB';
  −
</adsense>
  −
</center>
   
<br>
 
<br>
 
Well after [[Wikipedia_scandals#Essjay_is_not_a_professor|the scandal]] evolved into a serious public relations threat to Wikipedia's credibility, Wales sought to deflect responsibility for the whole affair by blaming the Arbitration Committee that he himself had created: "EssJay was appointed at the request of and unanimous support of the ArbCom." - Jimmy Wales [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083549.html 17 October 2007].  Perplexed members of the Arbitration Committee responded by saying it would be more accurate to describe their "unanimous support" as "nobody objected to Jimbo's nomination of Essjay".
 
Well after [[Wikipedia_scandals#Essjay_is_not_a_professor|the scandal]] evolved into a serious public relations threat to Wikipedia's credibility, Wales sought to deflect responsibility for the whole affair by blaming the Arbitration Committee that he himself had created: "EssJay was appointed at the request of and unanimous support of the ArbCom." - Jimmy Wales [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083549.html 17 October 2007].  Perplexed members of the Arbitration Committee responded by saying it would be more accurate to describe their "unanimous support" as "nobody objected to Jimbo's nomination of Essjay".

Navigation menu