Line 982: |
Line 982: |
| So, in general, it can happen that a use of the string of char "Cat" | | So, in general, it can happen that a use of the string of char "Cat" |
| may denote a particular cat, a category of cats, or a catitudiosity. | | may denote a particular cat, a category of cats, or a catitudiosity. |
− | </pre>
| |
− |
| |
− | ==Work Area==
| |
− |
| |
− | <pre>
| |
− | The word "intension" has recently come to be stressed in our discussions.
| |
− | As I first learned this word from my reading of Leibniz, I shall take it
| |
− | to be nothing more than a synonym for "property" or "quality", and shall
| |
− | probably always associate it with the primes factorization of integers,
| |
− | the analogy between having a factor and having a property being one of
| |
− | the most striking, at least to my neo-pythagorean compleated mystical
| |
− | sensitivities, that Leibniz ever posed, and of which certain facets
| |
− | of Peirce's work can be taken as a further polishing up, if one is
| |
− | of a mind to do so.
| |
− |
| |
− | As I dare not presume this to constitute the common acceptation
| |
− | of the term "intension", not without checking it out, at least,
| |
− | I will need to try and understand how others here understand
| |
− | the term and all of its various derivatives, thereby hoping
| |
− | to anticipate, that is to say, to evade or to intercept,
| |
− | a few of the brands of late-breaking misunderstandings
| |
− | that are so easy to find ourselves being surprised by,
| |
− | if one shies away from asking silly questions at the
| |
− | very first introduction of one of these parvenu words.
| |
− | I have been advised that it will probably be fruitless
| |
− | to ask direct questions of my informants in such a regard,
| |
− | but I do not see how else to catalyze the process of exposing
| |
− | the presumption that "it's just understood" when in fact it may
| |
− | be far from being so, and thus to clear the way for whatever real
| |
− | clarification might possibly be forthcoming, in the goodness of time.
| |
− | Just to be open, and patent, and completely above the metonymous board,
| |
− | I will lay out the paradigm that I myself bear in mind when I think about
| |
− | how I might place the locus and the sense of this term "intension", because
| |
− | I see the matter of where to lodge it in our logical logistic as being quite
| |
− | analogous to the issue of where to place those other i-words, namely, "idea",
| |
− | capitalized or not, "impresssion", "intelligible concept", and "interpretant".
| |
| </pre> | | </pre> |