Changes

Line 5,282: Line 5,282:  
In this setting, we would have:
 
In this setting, we would have:
   −
: 'l'<sup>w</sup> = 'l'<sup>(W<sub>1</sub> +, W<sub>2</sub> +, W<sub>3</sub>)</sup>  = 'l'W<sub>1</sub> , 'l'W<sub>2</sub> , 'l'W<sub>3</sub>.
+
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
 +
| <math>\mathit{l}^\mathrm{w} ~=~ \mathit{l}^{(\mathrm{W}_1 ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{W}_2 ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{W}_3)} ~=~ \mathit{l}\mathrm{W_1}, \mathit{l}\mathrm{W_2}, \mathit{l}\mathrm{W_3}.</math>
 +
|}
   −
That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse would be a lover of W<sub>1</sub> and a lover of W<sub>2</sub> and lover of W<sub>3</sub>.
+
That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse would be a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}_1\!</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}_2\!</math> and lover of <math>\mathrm{W}_3.\!</math>.
    
==References==
 
==References==
12,080

edits