Changes

Line 3,829: Line 3,829:  
===Commentary Note 11.7===
 
===Commentary Note 11.7===
   −
We come now to the very special cases of 2-adic relations that are known as functions.  It will serve a dual purpose on behalf of the exposition if we take the class of functions as a source of object examples to clarify the more abstruse concepts in the RIG material.
+
We come now to the very special cases of 2-adic relations that are known as ''functions''.  It will serve a dual purpose on behalf of the present exposition if we take the class of functions as a source of object examples to clarify the more abstruse concepts in the RIG material.
    
To begin, let's recall the definition of a ''local flag'':
 
To begin, let's recall the definition of a ''local flag'':
   −
: ''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub> = { (''x''<sub>1</sub>, , ''x''<sub>''j''</sub>, , ''x''<sub>''k''</sub>) &isin; ''L'' : ''x''<sub>''j''</sub> = ''x'' }.
+
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
 +
| <math>L_{x \star j} = \{ (x_1, \ldots, x_j, \ldots, x_k) \in L : x_j = x \}.</math>
 +
|}
    
In the case of a 2-adic relation ''L''&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''X''<sub>1</sub>&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''X''<sub>2</sub> = ''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''Y'', we can reap the benefits of a radical simplification in the definitions of the local flags.  Also in this case, we tend to denote ''L''<sub>''u''.1</sub> by "''L''<sub>''u''.''X''</sub>" and ''L''<sub>''v''.2</sub> by "''L''<sub>''v''.''Y''</sub>".
 
In the case of a 2-adic relation ''L''&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''X''<sub>1</sub>&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''X''<sub>2</sub> = ''X''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''Y'', we can reap the benefits of a radical simplification in the definitions of the local flags.  Also in this case, we tend to denote ''L''<sub>''u''.1</sub> by "''L''<sub>''u''.''X''</sub>" and ''L''<sub>''v''.2</sub> by "''L''<sub>''v''.''Y''</sub>".
12,080

edits