Line 49: |
Line 49: |
| ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. | | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. |
| * Caius 509/386 | | * Caius 509/386 |
− | ** Commentary on [[De Interpretation|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. | + | ** Commentary on [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. |
| * Caius 512/543 | | * Caius 512/543 |
| ** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]] | | ** Questions on the ''Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum'' by [[John of Felmingham]] |
| ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' | | ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' |
| ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. | | ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
| * Caius 611/341 | | * Caius 611/341 |
| ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. | | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. |
Line 64: |
Line 60: |
| * Caius 668/645 | | * Caius 668/645 |
| ** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian | | ** [[Thomas Cherminstre]], Questions on Priscian |
− | ** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora]]. | + | ** [[William de Duffelde]], probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the ''Analytica Posteriora''. |
| | | |
| == Pembroke == | | == Pembroke == |