Changes

Criticism of crowdsourcing (view source)

Revision as of 03:04, 12 October 2008

816 bytes removed , 03:04, 12 October 2008

Line 40: Line 40:

::I think this is the way I'm leaning, but I reserve the right to change my mind. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 20:59, 10 October 2008 (PDT)

::I do. A wiki can work perfectly well if participation is restricted and the management exercises diligence over its contents. -- Signed by [[User:Proabivouac]]00:58, October 11, 2008

−

::A wiki can work, and indeed I think that both wiki and forum should exist together. There are various problems with a wiki, however, including the various elements (at least with MediaWiki) that encourage stalking. Wikis should have owned articles, such that each individual article is controlled by 1 person with an expertise in the subject matter, then others assist with any minor fixes in the article. Forget about trying to have neutrality, as neutrality, and bias, are in the eye of the beholder. Instead work towards accuracy. The problem with wikis, ultimately, is control, and this can easily be remedied. But a wiki can only show the final product, it cannot easily show how that final product was discovered. That is what the forum is for. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 20:02, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

===Combination of Message Board/Wiki===

Blissyu2

95

edits