Line 2,408: |
Line 2,408: |
| We come now to the very special cases of 2-adic relations that are known as functions. It will serve a dual purpose on behalf of the exposition if we take the class of functions as a source of object examples to clarify the more abstruse concepts in the RIG material. | | We come now to the very special cases of 2-adic relations that are known as functions. It will serve a dual purpose on behalf of the exposition if we take the class of functions as a source of object examples to clarify the more abstruse concepts in the RIG material. |
| | | |
− | To begin, let's recall the definition of a local flag: | + | To begin, let's recall the definition of a ''local flag'': |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | : ''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub> = { (''x''<sub>1</sub>, …, ''x''<sub>''j''</sub>, …, ''x''<sub>''k''</sub>) ∈ ''L'' : ''x''<sub>''j''</sub> = ''x'' }. |
− | L_x@j = {<x_1, ..., x_j, ..., x_k> in L : x_j = x}.
| |
− | </pre> | |
− | | |
− | In the case of a 2-adic relation L c X_1 x X_2 = X x Y, we can reap the benefits of a radical simplification in the definitions of the local flags. Also in this case, we tend to denote L_u@1 by "L_u@X" and L_v@2 by "L_v@Y".
| |
| | | |
− | In the light of these considerations, the local flags of a 2-adic relation L c X x Y may be formulated as follows: | + | In the case of a 2-adic relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X''<sub>1</sub> × ''X''<sub>2</sub> = ''X'' × ''Y'', we can reap the benefits of a radical simplification in the definitions of the local flags. Also in this case, we tend to denote ''L''<sub>''u''.1</sub> by "''L''<sub>''u''.''X''</sub>" and ''L''<sub>''v''.2</sub> by "''L''<sub>''v''.''Y''</sub>". |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | In the light of these considerations, the local flags of a 2-adic relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' may be formulated as follows: |
− | L_u@X = {<x, y> in L : x = u}
| |
| | | |
− | = the set of all ordered pairs in L incident with u in X.
| + | {| cellpadding="4" |
− | | + | | ''L''<sub>''u''.''X''</sub> |
− | L_v@Y = {<x, y> in L : y = v}
| + | | = |
− | | + | | {(x, y) ∈ ''L'' : ''x'' = ''u''} |
− | = the set of all ordered pairs in L incident with v in Y.
| + | |- |
− | </pre>
| + | | |
| + | | = |
| + | | the set of all ordered pairs in ''L'' incident with ''u'' in ''X''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''L''<sub>''v''.''Y''</sub> |
| + | | = |
| + | | {(''x'', ''y'') ∈ ''L'' : ''y'' = ''v''} |
| + | |- |
| + | | |
| + | | = |
| + | | the set of all ordered pairs in ''L'' incident with ''v'' in ''Y''. |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| A sufficient illustration is supplied by the earlier example ''E''. | | A sufficient illustration is supplied by the earlier example ''E''. |
Line 2,440: |
Line 2,446: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | The local flag E_3@X is displayed here: | + | The local flag ''E''<sub>3.''X''</sub> is displayed here: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 2,446: |
Line 2,452: |
| o o o o o o o o o o X | | o o o o o o o o o o X |
| /|\ | | /|\ |
− | / | \ E_3@X | + | / | \ E_3.X |
| / | \ | | / | \ |
| o o o o o o o o o o Y | | o o o o o o o o o o Y |
Line 2,452: |
Line 2,458: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | The local flag E_2@Y is displayed here: | + | The local flag ''E''<sub>2.''Y''</sub> is displayed here: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 2,458: |
Line 2,464: |
| o o o o o o o o o o X | | o o o o o o o o o o X |
| \ | / | | \ | / |
− | \ | / E_2@Y | + | \ | / E_2.Y |
| \|/ | | \|/ |
| o o o o o o o o o o Y | | o o o o o o o o o o Y |