Changes

→‎Operational Representation: don't know why but inserting " " after ":" at the problem point seems to fix it
Line 2,314: Line 2,314:  
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
<math>\begin{array}{c}
+
<math>\begin{matrix}
 
f_{1}
 
f_{1}
 
\\[4pt]
 
\\[4pt]
Line 2,322: Line 2,322:  
\\[4pt]
 
\\[4pt]
 
f_8
 
f_8
\end{array}\!</math>
+
\end{matrix}\!</math>
 
|
 
|
 
<math>\begin{matrix}
 
<math>\begin{matrix}
Line 2,901: Line 2,901:  
Recognizing that <math>a\!:\!a + b\!:\!b + c\!:\!c\!</math> is the identity transformation otherwise known as <math>\mathit{1},\!</math> the 2-adic relative term <math>m = {}^{\backprime\backprime}\, \text{marker for}\, \underline{~ ~ ~}\, {}^{\prime\prime}~\!</math> can be parsed as an element <math>\mathit{1} + a\!:\!b + b\!:\!c + c\!:\!a\!</math> of the so-called ''group ring'', all of which makes this element just a special sort of linear transformation.
 
Recognizing that <math>a\!:\!a + b\!:\!b + c\!:\!c\!</math> is the identity transformation otherwise known as <math>\mathit{1},\!</math> the 2-adic relative term <math>m = {}^{\backprime\backprime}\, \text{marker for}\, \underline{~ ~ ~}\, {}^{\prime\prime}~\!</math> can be parsed as an element <math>\mathit{1} + a\!:\!b + b\!:\!c + c\!:\!a\!</math> of the so-called ''group ring'', all of which makes this element just a special sort of linear transformation.
   −
Up to this point, we are still reading the elementary relatives of the form <math>i\!:\!j</math> in the way that Peirce read them in logical contexts:
+
Up to this point, we are still reading the elementary relatives of the form <math>i\!:\!j\!</math> in the way that Peirce read them in logical contexts:&nbsp; <math>i\!</math> is the relate, <math>j\!</math> is the correlate, and in our current example <math>i\!:\!j,\!</math> or more exactly, <math>m_{ij} = 1,\!</math> is taken to say that <math>i\!</math> is a marker for <math>j.\!</math>&nbsp; This is the mode of reading that we call &ldquo;multiplying on the left&rdquo;.
    
==Logical Cacti==
 
==Logical Cacti==
12,080

edits