Line 10,933: |
Line 10,933: |
| A variant pair of reflective extensions, <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{A} | E_1)\!</math> and <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{B} | E_1),\!</math> are presented in Tables 82 and 83, respectively. These are identical to the corresponding free variants, <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{A})\!</math> and <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{B}),\!</math> with the exception of those entries that are constrained by the following system of semantic equations. | | A variant pair of reflective extensions, <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{A} | E_1)\!</math> and <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{B} | E_1),\!</math> are presented in Tables 82 and 83, respectively. These are identical to the corresponding free variants, <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{A})\!</math> and <math>\operatorname{Ref}^1 (\text{B}),\!</math> with the exception of those entries that are constrained by the following system of semantic equations. |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="8" width="90%" |
− | E1: <<A>> = <A>, <<B>> = <B>, <<i>> = <i>, <<u>> = <u>.
| + | | |
| + | <math>\begin{matrix} |
| + | E_1 : |
| + | & |
| + | {}^{\langle\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle\rangle} = {}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle}, |
| + | & |
| + | {}^{\langle\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle\rangle} = {}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle}, |
| + | & |
| + | {}^{\langle\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle\rangle} = {}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle}, |
| + | & |
| + | {}^{\langle\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle\rangle} = {}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle}. |
| + | \end{matrix}</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| This has the effect of making all levels of quotation equivalent. | | This has the effect of making all levels of quotation equivalent. |
− |
| |
− | By calling attention to their intended status as "semantic" equations, meaning that signs are being set equal in the SECs they inhabit or the objects they denote, I hope to emphasize that these equations are able to say something significant about objects.
| |
− |
| |
− | ??? Redo F(S) over W ??? Use WF = O U F ???
| |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |
Line 11,364: |
Line 11,371: |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |
| + | |
| + | By calling attention to their intended status as ''semantic'' equations, meaning that signs are being set equal in the semantic equivalence classes they inhabit or the objects they denote, I hope to emphasize that these equations are able to say something significant about objects. |
| + | |
| + | '''Question.''' Redo <math>F(S)\!</math> over <math>W\!</math>? Use <math>W_F = O \cup F\!</math>? |
| | | |
| ===6.44. Reflections on Closure=== | | ===6.44. Reflections on Closure=== |