Changes

The case against Gwen Gale (view source)

Revision as of 15:12, 26 February 2012

1,319 bytes removed , 15:12, 26 February 2012

Line 176: Line 176:

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Gwen_Gale Gwen Gale failed to mention her "The Witch" account in her statement], when she unsuccessfully tried to get elected to ArbCom.

−

~~===Gwen Gale unable to assume good faith===~~

−

~~[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive17#Unblock_request This discussion] demonstrates Gwen Gale inability to assume good faith.~~

−

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richard_Arthur_Norton_%281958-_%29 Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Richard_Arthur_Norton_%281958-_%29&diff=prev&oldid=364916173 blocked] for 72 hours for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2010_May_24&diff=prev&oldid=364914402 this edit, in which the user corrected a punctuation typo]. Please take a look at this comment Gwen Gale made, when asked about the block: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive17#Unblock_request "He was not moving on, he was hiding the warnings, knowing he would most likely be blocked for carrying on with his disruption and hoping that a careless admin would think he was blocked for correcting a punctuation typo. This is also why he put his unblock request at the top of the page, far away from the block notice. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)"]. Hey, Gwen, you did block him "for correcting a punctuation typo", did you not?

−

~~The user was unblocked in a few hours with edit summary "Block not covered by Wikipedia:Blocking policy".~~

===Recent misuse of administrative tools===

Kolobok

236

edits