Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Chapter One - Origin and Events == | | == Chapter One - Origin and Events == |
− | Some fathers of history, (based on Diti- contemporary Cretan concerning the war of Troy), wish that Antenore was the first to land on the island and build a city. Because of the islands dark appearance of its woods it was called ''Corcira Melaena''. Other followers of his position claim that they should not be exiles of Ilius, but fugitives of Gnido. In turn the vernacularisation of Ditti, work of Cav.<ref>Cavaliere = Knight (honorary title)</ref> Compagnoni, <ref>Dalmatia, literary sheet, 1st January 1846; No. 1</ref> no longer Antenore, who remained in [[Greece]], but the said Aeneas, would like as leader of the colony and founder of the ''City of Curzola'', (Korčula's old name was Curzola)<ref>Editors notes: The Old-Slavic term was Krkar.</ref> competing with the opinion of Darete, Phrygian and other contemporary. | + | Some fathers of history took notice of the writings of Diti who was a contemporary from Cretan. When writing about the war of Troy, he noted that Antenore was the first to land on the island and build a city. Because of the islands dark appearance of its woods it was called ''Corcira Melaena''. Other followers of his position claim that they were not exiles of Ilius, but fugitives of Gnido. In turn the vernacularisation of Ditti, work of Cav.<ref>Cavaliere = Knight (honorary title)</ref> Compagnoni, <ref>Dalmatia, literary sheet, 1st January 1846; No. 1</ref> stated that Antenore remained in [[Greece]], but the said Aeneas, was the likely leader of the colony and founder of the ''City of Curzola'', (Korčula's old name was Curzola)<ref>Editors notes: The Old-Slavic term was Krkar.</ref> competing with the opinion of Darete, Phrygian and other contemporaries. |
| | | |
− | The truth of this claim, considering the mythological chronology of the grammatical Alexandrian Heratostene, would oblige us to go back to approximately 1184 BC, at the time in which according to the Bible, Gideon judged Israel: 126 years prior to David coming to the throne. But the historian, more traditional than anything else, cannot rely on vague claims. Yet least of all when facing criticism and ''Diti'' and ''Darete'' did not know how to support their historical existence and truth, whether Antenore or Aeneas was the leader, or Gnidi or the Trojans the colonists, the study of local antiquities cannot unless to arouse Trojans the colonists, the study of local antiquities cannot unless to arouse. | + | The truth of this claim, considering the mythological chronology of the grammatical ''Alexandrian Heratostene'', would oblige us to go back to approximately 1184 BC, at the time in which according to the Bible, Gideon judged Israel: 126 years prior to David coming to the throne. But the historian, more traditional than anything else, cannot rely on these vague claims. Yet least of all when facing criticism.''Diti'' and ''Darete'' did not know how to support their historical theory. Whether Antenore or Aeneas was the leader, or Gnidi or the Trojans the colonists, the study of local antiquities arouses a belief that Korčula in ancient times was not some Greco-Phoenician post. Even though during this period there are inferences which are not at all unfounded, none are of a particular positive nature. |
| | | |
− | Belief that Korčula in ancient times was not some Greco-Phoenician post. Even though of this period there are inferences which are not at all unfounded, none are of a particular positive nature. The mystery clears then when the '''Illyrians''' becoming powerful lord the Adriatic, their king Agron, asserting his authority on the other neighbouring islands also occupied Korčula, in 250 B.C. On his death regaining its independence, the widow queen '''Teuta''' <ref>Editors notes: '''Queen Teuta''' (Ancient Greek: Τεύτα) was an Illyrian queen of the Ardiaei tribe who reigned approximately from 231 BC to 227 BC.</ref> took control of it again until Demetrius Fario, appointed as its prefect, surrendered it to the '''Romans''' together with Lesina (Hvar) his homeland. Whether Agron and Teuta had forcefully occupied the island with the use of arms, cannot be affirmed; the Alexandrian Appiano says no more than: ''"Pharumque bello captum"'' ; which makes us think it occurred due to combined dedication. Only in the times of ''Caesar'' '''Octavian Augustus''' (42 B.C.) does the name in the history of human events appear clear. It is done now for the first time, that the Curzolani <ref>Inhabitants of Curzola</ref> tried to seal the reacquired freedom with their own blood; they resisted with anguished courage to the arms of the triumvir who had come in person to conquer it, and equal to the resistance was the punishment.
| + | The mystery clears then when the '''Illyrians''' become powerful lords of the Adriatic. Their king Agron, asserting his authority on the other neighbouring islands also occupied Korčula, in 250 B.C. On his death regaining its independence, the widow queen '''Teuta''' <ref>Editors notes: '''Queen Teuta''' (Ancient Greek: Τεύτα) was an Illyrian queen of the Ardiaei tribe who reigned approximately from 231 BC to 227 BC.</ref> took control of it again until Demetrius Fario, appointed as its prefect, surrendered it to the '''Romans''' together with Lesina (Hvar) his homeland. Whether Agron and Teuta had forcefully occupied the island with the use of arms, cannot be affirmed. The Alexandrian Appiano says no more than: ''"Pharumque bello captum"'' ; which makes us think it occurred due to combined dedication. Only in the times of ''Caesar'' '''Octavian Augustus''' (42 B.C.) does the name in the history of human events appear clear. It is known now for the first time, that the Curzolani (inhabitants of Korčula) tried to seal their reacquired freedom with their own blood. They resisted with anguished courage to the arms of the Triumvir who had come in person to conquer it. The punishment was equal to the resistance. |
| | | |
− | The Alexandrian Appiano tells us of the severity of the punishment and the cause of the war: {{Cquote|''Divus Augustus deficientes Melitenses et Corcyrenses qui Insulas incolunt; ingenti belli mole superavit, quoniam maria classe praedebatur. Puberes ad unum caesi cetera multitudo sub corona venit.''}} But if Octavian in the repression caused it damaged, he didn’t consider it unworthy of his attention for its benefit; sending Roman colonists to it to direct it for better understood and regulated habits, paving the way to a much greater cultivation lessening the original coarseness. If the gravestones which are being unearthed among the ruins scattered across the island bear witness to the existence of the Roman colonies, they explain their purpose. | + | The Alexandrian Appiano tells us of the severity of the punishment and the cause of the war: {{Cquote|''Divus Augustus deficientes Melitenses et Corcyrenses qui Insulas incolunt; ingenti belli mole superavit, quoniam maria classe praedebatur. Puberes ad unum caesi cetera multitudo sub corona venit.''}} But if Octavian in the repression caused it to be damaged, he didn’t consider it unworthy of his attention for its benefit; sending Roman colonists to it to direct it for better understanding and regulated habits, paving the way to a much greater cultivation and lessening the original coarseness. If the gravestones which are being unearthed among the ruins scattered across the island bear witness to the existence of the Roman colonies, they explain their purpose. |
| | | |
− | Korčula from its origins to the present time has been in existence for 3,038 years, and history classifies its political life in the following phases: | + | Korčula, from its origins to the present time, has been in existence for 3,038 years, and history classifies its political life in the following phases: |
| *Free with her own independence until the occupation by Agron, and then for very short intervals by Teuta, by the Romans until Octaviano Augustus; and then at the time of the Veneti <ref> People from the Veneto Region</ref> from 1180 to 1252, from 1254 to 1258, and from 1418 to 1420, on the whole. | | *Free with her own independence until the occupation by Agron, and then for very short intervals by Teuta, by the Romans until Octaviano Augustus; and then at the time of the Veneti <ref> People from the Veneto Region</ref> from 1180 to 1252, from 1254 to 1258, and from 1418 to 1420, on the whole. |
| *Subject to the Roman Emperors first from the west, then from the east, by Augustus at Heraclius until 642. | | *Subject to the Roman Emperors first from the west, then from the east, by Augustus at Heraclius until 642. |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| *Conquered by the Veneti under the management of the doge '''Pietro Orscolo''' from 999 to 1100. | | *Conquered by the Veneti under the management of the doge '''Pietro Orscolo''' from 999 to 1100. |
| *Held by the Genoese from 1100 to 1129. | | *Held by the Genoese from 1100 to 1129. |
− | *Recaptured by Popone Zorzi, from the Veneto Region, and by the Republic subjected to this house from 1129 to 1180, from 1252 to 1254, and from 1258 until 1357 | + | *Recaptured by Popone Zorzi, from the Veneto Region, and by the Republic subjected to this house from 1129 to 1180, from 1252 to 1254, and from 1258 until 1357. |
| *Possessed on behalf of the king of [[Hungary]] from 1257 and with brief interruptions of the Genoese until 1418. | | *Possessed on behalf of the king of [[Hungary]] from 1257 and with brief interruptions of the Genoese until 1418. |
| *Devoting itself of its own accord to the ''Republic of Venice'' in 1420, and held by it with exemption from any tax until 1797. | | *Devoting itself of its own accord to the ''Republic of Venice'' in 1420, and held by it with exemption from any tax until 1797. |
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| *Occupied by [[Austria]], first by obligation from 1797 to 1806, later by Vienna Treaty from 1815 to the present 1858. | | *Occupied by [[Austria]], first by obligation from 1797 to 1806, later by Vienna Treaty from 1815 to the present 1858. |
| | | |
− | Protected by the Roman eagles Korčula enjoyed peace and was well-off, nor due to the change of events did she try to claim freedom; and as at first was faithful to Rome, the Empire divided she obeyed Constantinople. But with the Caesars’ loss of power the days of pain were nearing; | + | Protected by the Roman eagles, Korčula enjoyed peace and was well-off. Nor due to the change of events did she try to claim freedom; and as at first was faithful to Rome when the Empire divided she was ruled by Constantinople. But with the Caesars’ loss of power the days of pain were nearing; |
| <br> | | <br> |
| ---- | | ---- |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |
− | From a very old report of not so long discovery, that we don’t consider apocryphal, is noted how frightening the invasion of the Narentani (Neretljani) was for the island, and as to a certain king ''qui fugiens a persecution galearum Narentinorum construxit arcem in Siralievax'', in which with one hundred of his followers he had stationed himself, succeeded to gather the surrounding defence to himself. This king would have built other fortresses there: maxima autem , says the report, ''arx fuit in domorio incolum quem locum appellant Bradat apud domum unius hominis probi, et sacnti quem incolae dicunt Sveti Visko'' – had the inhabitants of Korcula equip six prisons at his own expense, and thus also erect three shelters - ''in portu ad septentrionem montis sic dicti Gradinae ubi sistebant naves nostril regis clementissimi.....non longe maris interni Insulae aptus locus est ad debellandos piratas fortes Narentinos molestos valde.'' Of all this there are obvious ruins to date. | + | From a very old report of not so long discovery, that we don’t consider apocryphal, is noted how frightening the invasion of the Narentani (Neretljani) was for the island, and as to a certain king ''qui fugiens a persecution galearum Narentinorum construxit arcem in Siralievax'', in which with one hundred of his followers he had stationed himself, succeeded to gather the surrounding defence to himself. This king would have built other fortresses there: maxima autem , says the report, ''arx fuit in domorio incolum quem locum appellant Bradat apud domum unius hominis probi, et sacnti quem incolae dicunt Sveti Visko'' – had the inhabitants of Korčula equip six prisons at his own expense, and thus also erect three shelters - ''in portu ad septentrionem montis sic dicti Gradinae ubi sistebant naves nostril regis clementissimi.....non longe maris interni Insulae aptus locus est ad debellandos piratas fortes Narentinos molestos valde.'' Of all this there are obvious ruins to date. |
| | | |
| Despite the relentless defence bravely sustained by the inhabitants, most from the Mattani in the fortress of Siralievaz, every effort was useless, the king was compelled to flee from the island; in fact he was almost taken by the Narentani (Neretljani) in the sortie made from the last western promontory, if he had not been freed on the part of the islander. The reporter gives his name as Ristle and declares himself minister of the king, after his death which occurred elsewhere with royal brother Ottoniero, states that he returned to the island, where he had a sister desponsata Patron Spaho: {{Cquote|''.... domino domorij Sitinitiani (Sitnizza) pulcherimi agri in quo habebat tentorio et capiebat aves ... et inveni, continues, Narentinos depopulasse multa. Omnes mee vires sestebant in conspectioneagrorum atque navium ... nos non possumus prodire nullibi, nisi in fortes hostes incurramus.''}} In this hard aggression both towns of which the ruins can still be seen in ''Bradat'' and ''Potirna'', inhabited also by Roman families, as the gravestones and many other ancient pieces not so long ago unearthed bear witness. | | Despite the relentless defence bravely sustained by the inhabitants, most from the Mattani in the fortress of Siralievaz, every effort was useless, the king was compelled to flee from the island; in fact he was almost taken by the Narentani (Neretljani) in the sortie made from the last western promontory, if he had not been freed on the part of the islander. The reporter gives his name as Ristle and declares himself minister of the king, after his death which occurred elsewhere with royal brother Ottoniero, states that he returned to the island, where he had a sister desponsata Patron Spaho: {{Cquote|''.... domino domorij Sitinitiani (Sitnizza) pulcherimi agri in quo habebat tentorio et capiebat aves ... et inveni, continues, Narentinos depopulasse multa. Omnes mee vires sestebant in conspectioneagrorum atque navium ... nos non possumus prodire nullibi, nisi in fortes hostes incurramus.''}} In this hard aggression both towns of which the ruins can still be seen in ''Bradat'' and ''Potirna'', inhabited also by Roman families, as the gravestones and many other ancient pieces not so long ago unearthed bear witness. |