Line 829: |
Line 829: |
| | | | | |
| | (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 666, 351). | | | (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 666, 351). |
− | </pre>
| |
− |
| |
− | ====1.3.8. Rondeau — Tempo di Menuetto====
| |
− |
| |
− | <pre>
| |
− | | And do you know what "the world" is to me?
| |
− | | Shall I show it to you in my mirror?
| |
− | | This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end;
| |
− | | a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller,
| |
− | | that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole,
| |
− | | of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but
| |
− | | likewise without increase or income; enclosed by "nothingness"
| |
− | | as by a boundary; not something blurry or wasted, not something
| |
− | | endlessly extended, but set in a definite space as a definite force,
| |
− | | and not a space that might be "empty" here or there, but rather as
| |
− | | force throughout, as a play of forces and waves of forces, at the
| |
− | | same time one and many, increasing here and at the same time
| |
− | | decreasing there; a sea of forces flowing and rushing together,
| |
− | | eternally changing, eternally flooding back, with tremendous years
| |
− | | of recurrence, with an ebb and a flood of its forms; out of the
| |
− | | simplest forms striving toward the most complex, out of the stillest,
| |
− | | most rigid, coldest forms toward the hottest, most turbulent, most
| |
− | | self-contradictory, and then again returning home to the simple
| |
− | | out of this abundance, out of the play of contradictions back
| |
− | | to the joy of concord, still affirming itself in this uniformity
| |
− | | of its courses and its years, blessing itself as that which must
| |
− | | return eternally, as a becoming that knows no satiety, no disgust,
| |
− | | no weariness: this, my Dionysian world of the eternally self-creating,
| |
− | | the eternally self-destroying, this mystery world of the twofold
| |
− | | voluptuous delight, my "beyond good and evil", without goal,
| |
− | | unless the joy of the circle is itself a goal; without will,
| |
− | | unless a ring feels good will toward itself -- do you want
| |
− | | a name for this world? A solution for all its riddles?
| |
− | | A light for you, too, you best-concealed, strongest,
| |
− | | most intrepid, most midnightly men? -- This world
| |
− | | is the will to power -- and nothing besides!
| |
− | | And you yourselves are also this will to power --
| |
− | | and nothing besides!
| |
− | |
| |
− | | (Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power', S 1067, 549-550).
| |
− |
| |
− | I have attempted in a narrative form to present an accurate picture
| |
− | of the formalization process as it develops in practice. Of course,
| |
− | accuracy must be distinguished from precision, for there are times
| |
− | when accuracy is better served by a vague outline that captures the
| |
− | manner of the subject than it is by a minute account that misses
| |
− | the mark entirely or catches each detail at the expense of losing
| |
− | the central point. Conveying the traffic between chaos and form
| |
− | under the restraint of an overbearing and excisive taxonomy would
| |
− | have sheared away half the picture and robbed the whole exchange
| |
− | of the lion's share of the duty.
| |
− |
| |
− | At moments I could do no better than to break into metaphor, but
| |
− | I believe that a certain tolerance for metaphor, especially in the
| |
− | initial stages of formalization, is a necessary capacity for reaching
| |
− | beyond the secure boundaries of what is already comfortable to reason.
| |
− | Plus, a controlled transport of metaphor allows one to draw on the
| |
− | boundless store of ready analogies and germinal morphisms that
| |
− | every natural language provides for free.
| |
− |
| |
− | Finally, it would leave an unfair impression to delete the characters
| |
− | of narrative and metaphor from the text of the story, and especially
| |
− | after they have had such a hand in creating it.
| |
− |
| |
− | Even the most precise of established formulations cannot be protected
| |
− | from being reused in ways that initially appear as abuses of language.
| |
− |
| |
− | One of the most difficult questions about the development of intelligent
| |
− | systems is how the power of abstraction can arise, beginning from the
| |
− | kinds of formal systems where each symbol has one meaning at most.
| |
− | I think that the natural pathway of this evolution has to go
| |
− | through the obscure territory of ambiguity and metaphor.
| |
− |
| |
− | A critical phase and a crucial step in the development of intelligent systems,
| |
− | whether biological or technological, is concerned with achieving a certain
| |
− | power of abstraction, but the real trick is for the budding intelligence
| |
− | to accomplish this without losing a grip on the material contents of
| |
− | the abstract categories, the labels and levels of which this power
| |
− | intercalates and interposes between essence and existence.
| |
− |
| |
− | If one looks to the surface material of natural languages for signs of
| |
− | how this power of abstraction might arise, one finds a suggestive set of
| |
− | potential precursors in the phenomena of ambiguity, anaphora, and metaphor.
| |
− | Keeping this in mind throughout the project, I aim to pay close attention
| |
− | to the places where the power of abstraction seems to develop, especially
| |
− | in the guises of systematic ambiguity and controlled metaphor.
| |
− |
| |
− | Paradoxically, and a bit ironically, if one's initial attempt to
| |
− | formalize meaning begins with the goal of stamping out ambiguity,
| |
− | metaphor, and all forms of figurative language use, then one may
| |
− | have precluded all hope of developing a capacity for abstraction
| |
− | at any later stage.
| |
| </pre> | | </pre> |