We have been examining several distinct but closely related notions of ''indication''. To discuss the import of these ideas in greater depth, it serves to establish a number of logical relations and set-theoretic identities that can be found to hold among their roughly parallel arrays of conceptions and constructions. Facilitating this task requires in turn a number of auxiliary concepts and notations. The notions of indication in question are expressed in a variety of different notations, enumerated as follows:
+
We have been examining several distinct but closely related notions of ''indication''. To discuss the import of these ideas in greater depth, it serves to establish a number of logical relations and set-theoretic identities that can be found to hold among this array of conceptions and constructions. Facilitating this task requires in turn a number of auxiliary concepts and notations. The notions of indication in question are expressed in a variety of different notations, enumerated as follows:
# The functional language of propositions
# The functional language of propositions
Line 11:
Line 11:
# The geometric language of sets
# The geometric language of sets
−
Thus, one way to explain the relationships that exist among several concepts of indication is to describe the translations that must hold as a result between the associated families of notation.
+
Thus, one way to explain the relationships that exist among these concepts is to describe the ''translations'' that are induced among the allied families of notation.