Changes

7 bytes removed ,  22:04, 1 September 2010
Line 11,509: Line 11,509:  
=====1.3.12.3.  Digression on Derived Relations=====
 
=====1.3.12.3.  Digression on Derived Relations=====
   −
<pre>
   
A better understanding of derived equivalence relations (DER's) can be achieved by placing their constructions within a more general context, and thus comparing the associated type of derivation operation, namely, the one that takes a triadic relation R into a dyadic relation Der(R), with other types of operations on triadic relations.  The proper setting would permit a comparative study of all their constructions from a basic set of projections and a full array of compositions on dyadic relations.
 
A better understanding of derived equivalence relations (DER's) can be achieved by placing their constructions within a more general context, and thus comparing the associated type of derivation operation, namely, the one that takes a triadic relation R into a dyadic relation Der(R), with other types of operations on triadic relations.  The proper setting would permit a comparative study of all their constructions from a basic set of projections and a full array of compositions on dyadic relations.
    
To that end, let the derivation Der(R) be expressed in the following way:
 
To that end, let the derivation Der(R) be expressed in the following way:
   −
{DerR}(x, y)  =  Conj(o C O) (( {RSO}(x, o) , {ROS}(o, y) )).
+
: {DerR}(x, y)  =  Conj(o C O) (( {RSO}(x, o) , {ROS}(o, y) )).
    
From this abstract a form of composition, temporarily notated as "P#Q", where P c XxM and Q c MxY are otherwise arbitrary dyadic relations, and where P#Q c XxY is defined as follows:
 
From this abstract a form of composition, temporarily notated as "P#Q", where P c XxM and Q c MxY are otherwise arbitrary dyadic relations, and where P#Q c XxY is defined as follows:
   −
{P#Q}(x, y) = Conj(m C M) (( {P}(x, m) , {Q}(m, y) )).
+
: {P#Q}(x, y) = Conj(m C M) (( {P}(x, m) , {Q}(m, y) )).
    
Compare this with the usual form of composition, typically notated as "P.Q" and defined as follows:
 
Compare this with the usual form of composition, typically notated as "P.Q" and defined as follows:
   −
{P.Q}(x, y) = Disj(m C M) ( {P}(x, m) . {Q}(m, y) ).
+
: {P.Q}(x, y) = Disj(m C M) ( {P}(x, m) . {Q}(m, y) ).
</pre>
      
===1.4.  Outlook of the Project : All Ways Lead to Inquiry===
 
===1.4.  Outlook of the Project : All Ways Lead to Inquiry===
12,080

edits