Changes

==Reactions==

==Reactions==

* I have seen your posts on Wikipedia Review and Wikiversity regarding

 

the subject of "ethical breaching  experiments." These generally are not

* I have seen your posts on Wikipedia Review and Wikiversity regarding the subject of "ethical breaching  experiments". These generally are not permissible, and your involvement would be particularly unhelpful in light of prior history. Please refrain from engaging in, or inducing others to engage in, this practice. [[w:User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[w:User  talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 15:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

permissible, and your involvement would be particularly unhelpful in

 

light of prior history. Please refrain from engaging in, or inducing

others to engage in, this practice. [[w:User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]]

([[w:User  talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 15:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

(newyorkbrad  is a member of the english wikipedia's 'arbcom')

(newyorkbrad  is a member of the english wikipedia's 'arbcom')

* The only thing I'd  personally like to see regarding "breaching

 

experiments", especially that those that deliberately insert bad/false

* The only thing I'd  personally like to see regarding "breaching experiments", especially that those that deliberately insert bad/false information into  articles is: "Don't do them.", personally. They violate WP:POINT in a way that cannot easily be reconciled with further editing. [[w:User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]]  ([[w:User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 01:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

information into  articles is: "Don't do them.", personally. They violate

 

WP:POINT in a way that cannot easily be reconciled with further editing.

(sirfozzie is a member of the english wikipedia's 'arbcom')

[[w:User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]]  ([[w:User talk:SirFozzie|talk]]) 01:47,

 

19 January 2010 (UTC) (sirfozzie is a member of the english wikipedia's

* The  Dept of Fatherland Security runs deliberate tests of the airport security system, by having agents see if they can get stuff past the screeners, who are (supposedly) left out of the loop. It's very important QC instrument. But suppose they were total doofuses who weren't doing  this AT ALL. And suppose some citizens decided to take it upon  themselves, using harmless toy mockups and so forth. Can you imagine the shitstorm? That's rather what we have at Wikipedia. They won't do  it themselves, and they won't let anybody else do it, either. — "Milton Roe" ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216244 link])

'arbcom')

 

* The  Dept of Fatherland Security runs deliberate tests of the airport

* This page was deleted, and undeleted, leading to [[Wikiversity:Community_Review/Wikimedia_Ethics:Ethical_Breaching_Experiments|this]] review.

security   system, by having agents see if they can get stuff past the

screeners,   who are (supposedly) left out of the loop. It's very

important QC instrument. But suppose they were total doofuses who

weren't doing  this AT ALL. And suppose some citizens decided to take it

upon  themselves, using harmless toy mockups and so forth. Can you

imagine the shitstorm? That's rather what we have at Wikipedia. They

won't do  it themselves, and they won't let anybody else do it, either. -

'Milton   Roe'

([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216244

link])

* This page was deleted, and undeleted, leading to

[[Wikiversity:Community_Review/Wikimedia_Ethics:Ethical_Breaching_Experiments|this]]

review.