Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 08, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
cleanup
Line 1: Line 1: −
Why do people execute '''breaching experiments'''? How do they do it? On
+
Why do people execute '''breaching experiments'''? How do they do it? On this page we discuss, analyze, explore, and study why and how people execute '''breaching experiments''' — in particular whether it's possible to conduct one ethically, and if so, how they might be designed and executed to best inform policy and practice on WMF projects. People who have formally executed breaching experiments may be asked to provide some insight as to why and how they did it for the purpose of better understanding what motivates people to do it.
this   page we discuss, analyze, explore, and study why and how people
  −
execute   '''breaching experiments''' - in particular whether it's
  −
possible to conduct one ethically, and if so, how they might be designed
  −
and executed to best inform policy and practice on WMF projects. People
  −
who   have formally executed breaching experiments may be asked to provide
  −
some   insight as to why and how they did it for the purpose of better
  −
understanding   what motivates people to do it.
      
==Participants==
 
==Participants==
 +
 
''please do  sign up below''
 
''please do  sign up below''
 
* [[User:Privatemusings|
 
* [[User:Privatemusings|
Line 14: Line 8:  
Privatemusings]] 00:47,  18  January 2010 (UTC)
 
Privatemusings]] 00:47,  18  January 2010 (UTC)
   −
== What is a breaching experiment? ==
+
==What is a breaching experiment?==
Please   have a go at your own definition below;
+
 
# '''ethical breaching experiment''': An experiment which causes no harm in its execution, whilst yielding results useful for the greater good, or which inspire  positive change, but which uses methods which may violate the letter  or spirit of the guideline [[w:Wikipedia:Do_not_disrupt_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point#State_your_point.3B_do_not_prove_it_experimentally|'Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point']]
+
Please have a go at your own definition below;
 +
# '''ethical breaching experiment''': An experiment which causes no harm in its execution, whilst yielding results useful for the greater good, or which inspire  positive change, but which uses methods which may violate the letter  or spirit of the guideline [[w:Wikipedia:Do_not_disrupt_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point#State_your_point.3B_do_not_prove_it_experimentally|'Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point']]
 
[[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]]  00:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 
[[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]]  00:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
   −
== Wikimedia examples ==
+
==Wikimedia examples==
 +
 
 
* [[w:Wikipedia:Newbie_treatment_at_Criteria_for_speedy_deletion|'WP:NEWT']]
 
* [[w:Wikipedia:Newbie_treatment_at_Criteria_for_speedy_deletion|'WP:NEWT']]
 +
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MZMcBride&oldid=338464991#Vandalizing_BLPs Provision of a list of unwatched biographical articles with the intention of some sort of experiment occurring] see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MZMcBride&oldid=338641888#Request here] for list of biographies, many of which feature 'breaching' edits in  their history. The project appears to have been halted by admin. and arbcom  involvement.
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MZMcBride&oldid=338464991#Vandalizing_BLPs Provision of a list of unwatched biographical articles with the intention of some sort of experiment occurring] see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MZMcBride&oldid=338641888#Request here] for list of biographies, many of which feature 'breaching' edits in  their history. The project appears to have been halted by admin. and arbcom  involvement.
    
==='On Wikipedia' Documents the Dr. Handel  debacle===
 
==='On Wikipedia' Documents the Dr. Handel  debacle===
 +
 
[http://onwikipedia.blogspot.com/2010/03/dr-handel-or-how-i-learned-to-stop.html
 
[http://onwikipedia.blogspot.com/2010/03/dr-handel-or-how-i-learned-to-stop.html
The   Dr. Handel debacle]
+
The Dr. Handel debacle]
    
[[/Mike Handel breach/|Wikiversity case  study on the Mike Handel
 
[[/Mike Handel breach/|Wikiversity case  study on the Mike Handel
Line 31: Line 29:     
===Report from Limey ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216251 link])===
 
===Report from Limey ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216251 link])===
 +
 
''I  have two lovely fake biographies on Wikipedia that have been there
 
''I  have two lovely fake biographies on Wikipedia that have been there
 
over  6 months. They've both been edited by other people, and contain
 
over  6 months. They've both been edited by other people, and contain
Line 39: Line 38:     
===Report from Herschelkrustofsky ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216255 link])===
 
===Report from Herschelkrustofsky ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216255 link])===
 +
 
''Plausible-sounding  but fictitious references exist in
 
''Plausible-sounding  but fictitious references exist in
 
[[w:Little_Roger_and_the_Goosebumps|Little  Roger and the Goosebumps]],
 
[[w:Little_Roger_and_the_Goosebumps|Little  Roger and the Goosebumps]],
Line 44: Line 44:     
===Report from Tarantino ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216258 link])===
 
===Report from Tarantino ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216258 link])===
 +
 
''[http://webcitation.org/5fpmjrc7T  This article] on the Himalayan Panda
 
''[http://webcitation.org/5fpmjrc7T  This article] on the Himalayan Panda
 
was created on April  Fools Day and  lasted nearly 6 months before it was
 
was created on April  Fools Day and  lasted nearly 6 months before it was
Line 50: Line 51:  
didn't  read them carefully.
 
didn't  read them carefully.
   −
It still lives on in a similar form on
+
It still lives on in a similar form on [http://www.webcitation.org/5mrbgqDo2 Persianne's user page].''
[http://www.webcitation.org/5mrbgqDo2 Persianne's user page].
+
 
''
+
==Hoaxes not apparently related to "breaching experiments"==
   −
==Hoaxes not apparently related to  'breaching experiments'==
   
* [http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20091211/its-the-casting-director-lee-dennison-story/ The Lee Dennison story]
 
* [http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20091211/its-the-casting-director-lee-dennison-story/ The Lee Dennison story]
    
==Suggestions / Ideas from others==
 
==Suggestions / Ideas from others==
===Suggestions   from Gomi ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216250 link])===
+
 
 +
===Suggestions from Gomi ([http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28227&view=findpost&p=216250 link])===
    
#  Add citations to plausible-sounding but fictitious references to BLPs
 
#  Add citations to plausible-sounding but fictitious references to BLPs
Line 64: Line 65:  
misinformation,  but supporting statements with fake references will show
 
misinformation,  but supporting statements with fake references will show
 
how open to  abuse the Wiki model is;
 
how open to  abuse the Wiki model is;
 +
 
# Create articles on non-existent people  and companies. This will be
 
# Create articles on non-existent people  and companies. This will be
 
difficult, but if carefully checked to be  non-existent, the harm done
 
difficult, but if carefully checked to be  non-existent, the harm done
 
here is minimal;
 
here is minimal;
 +
 
# Create fake  articles on (non-existent) latin-named plants and animals,
 
# Create fake  articles on (non-existent) latin-named plants and animals,
 
similar to  #2, above;
 
similar to  #2, above;
    
==related studies, non 'breaching'==
 
==related studies, non 'breaching'==
* [http://www.mywikibiz.com/Wikipedia_Vandalism_Study Wikipedia Vandalism Study] - concerning US Senator articles on the english
+
 
wikipedia.
+
* [http://www.mywikibiz.com/Wikipedia_Vandalism_Study Wikipedia Vandalism Study] — concerning U.S. Senator articles on the English Wikipedia.
    
==Possible areas of research==
 
==Possible areas of research==
 +
 
'''''Feel free to make suggestions below - you  may even be able to make
 
'''''Feel free to make suggestions below - you  may even be able to make
 
a point while you're at it! (see no.s 5 and 6  below ;-)'''''
 
a point while you're at it! (see no.s 5 and 6  below ;-)'''''
 +
 
# Comparing classes of articles - eg. how is  unsourced information
 
# Comparing classes of articles - eg. how is  unsourced information
 
treated when added by editors of similar  reputation in different classes
 
treated when added by editors of similar  reputation in different classes
 
of articles
 
of articles
 +
 
# Copyright concerns
 
# Copyright concerns
 +
 
#  Academic honesty / plagiarism
 
#  Academic honesty / plagiarism
 +
 
#"Violence is the last refuge of the  incompetent." -Isaac  Asimov
 
#"Violence is the last refuge of the  incompetent." -Isaac  Asimov
 
##from [[w:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] to  [[User:Moulton|Moulton]]:
 
##from [[w:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] to  [[User:Moulton|Moulton]]:
Line 88: Line 96:  
##censorship, bad  blocks and bad bans imposed by Wikimedia's abusive
 
##censorship, bad  blocks and bad bans imposed by Wikimedia's abusive
 
administrators
 
administrators
 +
 
#Studying  the effect on Wikiversity/Wikipedia relations - are
 
#Studying  the effect on Wikiversity/Wikipedia relations - are
 
experimental  pursuits into Wikipedia space, amid possible claims that
 
experimental  pursuits into Wikipedia space, amid possible claims that
12,080

edits

Navigation menu