Line 66: |
Line 66: |
| ==Hilbert== | | ==Hilbert== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="6" width="90%" |
− | <table align="center" cellpadding="6" style="border:none" width="90%"><td style="border:none">
| + | | |
| + | <p>Finally, let us recall our real subject and, so far as the infinite is concerned, draw the balance of all our reflections. The final result then is: nowhere is the infinite realized; it is neither present in nature nor admissible as a foundation in our rational thinking — a remarkable harmony between being and thought. We gain a conviction that runs counter to the earlier endeavors of Frege and Dedekind, the conviction that, if scientific knowledge is to be possible, certain intuitive conceptions <nowiki>[</nowiki>Vorstellungen<nowiki>]</nowiki> and insights are indispensable; logic alone does not suffice. The right to operate with the infinite can be secured only by means of the finite.</p> |
| | | |
− | <p>Finally, let us recall our real subject and, so far as the infinite is concerned, draw the balance of all our reflections. The final result then is: nowhere is the infinite realized; it is neither present in nature nor admissible as a foundation in our rational thinking — a remarkable harmony between being and thought. We gain a conviction that runs counter to the earlier endeavors of Frege and Dedekind, the conviction that, if scientific knowledge is to be possible, certain intuitive conceptions [Vorstellungen] and insights are indispensable; logic alone does not suffice. The right to operate with the infinite can be secured only by means of the finite.</p> | + | <p>The role that remains to the infinite is, rather, merely that of an idea — if, in accordance with Kant's words, we understand by an idea a concept of reason that transcends all experience and through which the concrete is completed so as to form a totality — an idea, moreover, in which we may have unhesitating confidence within the framework furnished by the theory that I have sketched and advocated here. (p. 392).</p> |
| | | |
− | <p>The role that remains to the infinite is, rather, merely that of an idea — if, in accordance with Kant's words, we understand by an idea a concept of reason that transcends all experience and through which the concrete is completed so as to form a totality — an idea, moreover, in which we may have unhesitating confidence within the framework furnished by the theory that I have sketched and advocated here. (p. 392).</p>
| + | <p>Hilbert (1925), “On the Infinite”, pp. 369–392 in Jean van Heijenoort (1967/1977).</p> |
− | | + | |} |
− | <p>Hilbert (1925), "On the Infinite", pp. 369–392 in Jean van Heijenoort (1967/1977).</p> | |
− | | |
− | </td></table>
| |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ==Hilbert and Ackermann== | | ==Hilbert and Ackermann== |