Changes

Line 3,960: Line 3,960:  
==Note 24==
 
==Note 24==
   −
<pre>
+
Now that we've introduced the field picture for thinking about propositions and their analytic series, a very pleasing way of picturing the relationship among a proposition <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B},</math> its enlargement or shift map <math>\operatorname{E}f : \operatorname{E}X \to \mathbb{B},</math> and its difference map <math>\operatorname{D}f : \operatorname{E}X \to \mathbb{B}</math> can now be drawn.
Now that we've introduced the field picture for thinking about
  −
propositions and their analytic series, a very pleasing way of
  −
picturing the relationship among a proposition f : X -> B, its
  −
enlargement or shift map Ef : EX -> B, and its difference map
  −
Df : EX -> B can now be drawn.
     −
To illustrate this possibility, let's return to the differential
+
To illustrate this possibility, let's return to the differential analysis of the conjunctive proposition <math>f(p, q) = pq,\!</math> giving the development a slightly different twist at the appropriate point.
analysis of the conjunctive proposition f<p, q> = pq, giving the
  −
development a slightly different twist at the appropriate point.
     −
Figure 24-1 shows the proposition pq once again, which we now view
+
Figure&nbsp;24-1 shows the proposition <math>pq\!</math> once again, which we now view as a scalar field, in effect, a potential "plateau" of elevation 1 over the shaded region, with an elevation of 0 everywhere else.
as a scalar field, in effect, a potential "plateau" of elevation 1
  −
over the shaded region, with an elevation of 0 everywhere else.
  −
</pre>
      
{| align="center" cellspacing="10" style="text-align:center; width:90%"
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="10" style="text-align:center; width:90%"
12,080

edits