| Line 3,280: |
Line 3,280: |
| | ===Commentary Note 10.10=== | | ===Commentary Note 10.10=== |
| | | | |
| − | Figure 8 depicts the last of the three examples involving the composition of 3-adic relatives with 2-adic relatives: | + | Figure 8 depicts the last of the three examples involving the composition of 3-adic relatives with 2-adic relatives: |
| | | | |
| | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| | + | | align="center" | |
| | <pre> | | <pre> |
| | o-------------------------------------------------o | | o-------------------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| − | | 'l',__$__% $'s'__* *%w | | + | | 'l',__!__@ !'s'__# #@w | |
| | | o o o o oo | | | | o o o o oo | |
| | | \ \ / \ // | | | | \ \ / \ // | |
| | | \ \/ @/ | | | | \ \/ @/ | |
| | | \ /\____ ____/ | | | | \ /\____ ____/ | |
| − | | @ @ | | + | | O O | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Line 3,297: |
Line 3,299: |
| | Figure 8. Lover that is a Servant of a Woman | | Figure 8. Lover that is a Servant of a Woman |
| | </pre> | | </pre> |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| − | The hypergraph picture of the abstract composition is given in Figure 14. | + | The hypergraph picture of the abstract composition is given in Figure 14. |
| | | | |
| | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| | + | | align="center" | |
| | <pre> | | <pre> |
| | o---------------------------------------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | L , S | | | | L , S | |
| − | | __________________^__________________ | | + | | __________________O__________________ | |
| | | / \ | | | | / \ | |
| | | / L_, S \ | | | | / L_, S \ | |
| − | | / @ @ \ | | + | | / O O \ | |
| | | / /|\ / \ \ | | | | / /|\ / \ \ | |
| | | / / | \ / \ \ | | | | / / | \ / \ \ | |
| Line 3,315: |
Line 3,320: |
| | | o o o o o o o | | | | o o o o o o o | |
| | | X X X Y X Y Y | | | | X X X Y X Y Y | |
| − | | 1,_# #'l',_$_____% $'t'________% %1 | | + | | 1,_! !'l',_@_____# @'t'________$ #1 | |
| | | o o o o o o o | | | | o o o o o o o | |
| | | \ / \ \ / | / | | | | \ / \ \ / | / | |
| Line 3,321: |
Line 3,326: |
| | | \ / \ / \ | / | | | | \ / \ / \ | / | |
| | | \ / \ / \___________|___________/ | | | | \ / \ / \___________|___________/ | |
| − | | @ @ @ | | + | | O O O | |
| | | !1! !1! !1! | | | | !1! !1! !1! | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Line 3,327: |
Line 3,332: |
| | Figure 14. Anything that's a Lover of Anything and that's a Servant of It | | Figure 14. Anything that's a Lover of Anything and that's a Servant of It |
| | </pre> | | </pre> |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| | This example illustrates the way that Peirce analyzes the logical conjunction, we might even say the "parallel conjunction", of a couple of 2-adic relatives in terms of the comma extension and the same style of composition that we saw in the last example, that is, according to a pattern of anaphora that invokes the teridentity relation. | | This example illustrates the way that Peirce analyzes the logical conjunction, we might even say the "parallel conjunction", of a couple of 2-adic relatives in terms of the comma extension and the same style of composition that we saw in the last example, that is, according to a pattern of anaphora that invokes the teridentity relation. |
| Line 3,332: |
Line 3,338: |
| | If we lay out this analysis of conjunction on the spreadsheet model of relational composition, the gist of it is the diagonal extension of a 2-adic "loving" relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' to the corresponding 3-adic "loving and being" relation ''L'', ⊆ ''X'' × ''X'' × ''Y'', which is then composed in a specific way with a 2-adic "serving" relation ''S'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'', so as to determine the 2-adic relation ''L'',''S'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y''. Table 15 schematizes the associated constraints on tuples. | | If we lay out this analysis of conjunction on the spreadsheet model of relational composition, the gist of it is the diagonal extension of a 2-adic "loving" relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' to the corresponding 3-adic "loving and being" relation ''L'', ⊆ ''X'' × ''X'' × ''Y'', which is then composed in a specific way with a 2-adic "serving" relation ''S'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'', so as to determine the 2-adic relation ''L'',''S'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y''. Table 15 schematizes the associated constraints on tuples. |
| | | | |
| | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| | + | | align="center" | |
| | <pre> | | <pre> |
| | Table 15. Conjunction Via Composition | | Table 15. Conjunction Via Composition |
| Line 3,344: |
Line 3,352: |
| | o---------o---------o---------o---------o | | o---------o---------o---------o---------o |
| | </pre> | | </pre> |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| | ===Commentary Note 10.11=== | | ===Commentary Note 10.11=== |