Line 89: |
Line 89: |
| ==Note 4== | | ==Note 4== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | I am preparing a more fleshed-out 1-variable example, but in the mean time, for anybody who's finished all that other reading, there is a more detailed account of differential logic at the following thread heads: |
− | I am preparing a more fleshed-out 1-variable example, | |
− | but in the mean time, for anybody who's finished all | |
− | that other reading, there is a more detailed account | |
− | of differential logic at the following thread heads: | |
| | | |
− | DLOG D. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-May/thread.html#478
| + | :* [http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-May/thread.html#478 Differential Logic D-a] |
− | DLOG D. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-June/thread.html#553
| + | :* [http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-June/thread.html#553 Differential Logic D-b] |
| | | |
− | For future reference, here are a couple of handy rosetta stones | + | For future reference, here are a couple of handy rosetta stones for translating back and forth between different notations for the boolean functions <math>f : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},</math> where <math>k = 1, 2.\!</math> |
− | for translating back and forth between different notations for | |
− | the boolean functions f : B^k -> B, where k = 1, 2. | |
| | | |
− | DLOG D11. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-May/000489.html
| + | :*[http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-May/000489.html Differential Logic D.11] |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ==Note 5== | | ==Note 5== |