Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* Digby 24 - Sophisma ''Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit'', Magister Abstractionum.
 
* Digby 24 - Sophisma ''Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit'', Magister Abstractionum.
 
* Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by  R.W.Hunt), beginning ''Innata est nobis'', probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by [[Boethius of Dacia]], and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the [[Directory:Logic Museum/Oxford condemnations of 1277|condemnations of 1277]].
 
* Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by  R.W.Hunt), beginning ''Innata est nobis'', probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by [[Boethius of Dacia]], and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the [[Directory:Logic Museum/Oxford condemnations of 1277|condemnations of 1277]].
* Digby 204 - [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summulae Dialectices'', [[Thomas Aquinas]] (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the ''Elenchi'' in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by [[Giles of Rome]].  
+
* Digby 204  
 +
** [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summulae Dialectices''
 +
** A work by [[Thomas Aquinas]] (?)
 +
** Thomas de Wyck a work on the ''Elenchi'' in the form of a treatise, possibly influenced by [[Giles of Rome]].  
 
* Lat misc. e 108
 
* Lat misc. e 108
  

Revision as of 12:11, 31 January 2009

Corpus Christi

Bodleian

  • Auct F. 5 23
  • Canon Lat. 278
  • Canon misc. 278
  • Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
    • commentary on Isagoge
    • commentary on Perihermenias
    • commentary on Praedicamenta.
  • Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
  • Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
  • Digby 204
  • Lat misc. e 108

Corpus Christi

  • Corpus Christi 119
  • Corpus Christi 250
  • Corpus Christi 293b

Merton

New College

  • New College 285

Peterhouse

Caius

  • Caius 344/540
  • Caius 434/434
    • Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
  • Caius 448/409
  • Caius 509/386
  • Caius 512/543
    • Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
    • William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
    • Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.
  • Caius 611/341
    • Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
  • Caius 612/543
  • Caius 668/645

Pembroke

  • Pembroke 193

Cambridge University Library

  • Kk3

Notes

  1. ^ Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', Synthese, xl (1979)