Changes

The case against Gwen Gale (view source)

Revision as of 23:23, 21 January 2012

1,319 bytes added , 23:23, 21 January 2012

Line 121: Line 121:

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&action=historysubmit&diff=222287525&oldid=222287133 Here's an example of Gwen Gale reverting a clearly good faith edit claiming it was "vandalism"]. In an apparent try to cover up she blocked the editor for edit warring with herself she also claimed "vandalism" in the edit summary for that block.

+

===Gwen Gale unable to assume good faith===

+

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive17#Unblock_request This discussion] demonstrates Gwen Gale inability to assume good faith.

+

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richard_Arthur_Norton_%281958-_%29 Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )] was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Richard_Arthur_Norton_%281958-_%29&diff=prev&oldid=364916173 blocked] for 72 hours for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2010_May_24&diff=prev&oldid=364914402 this edit, in which the user corrected a punctuation typo]. Please take a look at this comment Gwen Gale made, when asked about the block: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive17#Unblock_request "He was not moving on, he was hiding the warnings, knowing he would most likely be blocked for carrying on with his disruption and hoping that a careless admin would think he was blocked for correcting a punctuation typo. This is also why he put his unblock request at the top of the page, far away from the block notice. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)"]. Hey, Gwen, you did block him "for correcting a punctuation typo", did you not?

+

The user was unblocked in a few hours with edit summary "Block not covered by Wikipedia:Blocking policy".

===Recent misuse of administrative tools===

Kolobok

236

edits